Murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was "emailing wikileaks", says detective

[Lord Commander Palis]

I find it extremely hard to believe that any levelheaded person thinks Rich was just conveniently killed in a botched robbery.....

Not that I'm implying Clintons had him killed, but cmon
that's patently absurd

Only the "I'm with hers" don't even want to question it. Nothing but white knight cucks for Crooked Killary, their idol.

 

[fartJokes]

I think this quote demonstrates just how far gone you are. To have this view, you would need to already have a polarized worldview such that the Russia investigation is a false dem conspiracy that relates to their covering up their murder of a leaker. You would already have to believe that in order to believe what you wrote there. Which goes to my point about your fucked up intentions.

It shows how far up Hillary's ass you are. The DNC/Hitlery have been exposed for their complete corruption and you're still pretending that they aren't rotten enough to create a fake dossier to support a fake narrative in their ongoing effort to #RESIST.

How fucking naive and gullible are you? Hillary has destroyed the DNC and you're pretending that these criminals are somehow beyond reproach? Pathetic.

What we know:

1. The DNC claims they were hacked by Russians who stole their emails & gave them to Wikileaks.
2. The DNC/Clinton Campaign has been exposed as corrupt liars and cheats in the Democratic primary election.
3. Timestamps that indicate transfer rates prove the stolen emails were downloaded locally (likely possibility to usb drive/stick).
4. The DNC refused to give the server to the FBI.
5. Seth Rich had IT access to the DNC server.
6. Seth Rich was murdered.
7. Julian Assange has stated the leaked emails didn't come from Russia or any state actor.
8. Wikileaks has a solid track record regarding the legitimacy of its leaks; none have ever been shown to be fraudulent.
9. Julian Assange intimated, but did not definitively state, that (murdered) Seth Rich was the source of the leaked emails.

This is certainly a case that is tied closely enough to the DNC/Hillary campaign & it's confirmed corruption, to warrant suspicion & thorough investigation. Let's not pretend that they aren't mired in unethical and criminal behavior.

Thank Zeus Almighty that sociopath Hitlery was defeated. Can you imagine someone with so much entrenched power and so corrupt, solidifying that level of Orwellian corruption throughout our entire government. Jesus we dodged a bullet on that one.

And guess what assholes? I wasn't even a Trump supporter! But Hillary was the entrenched corrupt establishment candidate in that election. I would have like to see Rand Paul vs. Bernie. And I'm no socialist, but Bernie's top 2 issues speak to me: wanting to overturn Citizens United, and taking on Wall St. regulatory capture and corruption. You idiots defending Hitlery and the DNC are pathetic and only making yourselves look at as ethically compromised as Donna Brazile and friends. Time to man up and disavow the villiany of the Clinton Crime Syndicate.

 

[Jack V Savage]

New information.

Not to mention that JFK CTs are stupid, too.

I mean, they're more understandable because people don't want to believe that important world events can be caused by a single loser, while the Rich CT is driven entirely by partisanship and online trolling. But I don't like just letting the JFK stuff just skate by.

 

[Ruprecht]

Not to mention that JFK CTs are stupid, too.

I mean, they're more understandable because people don't want to believe that important world events can be caused by a single loser, while the Rich CT is driven entirely by partisanship and online trolling. But I don't like just letting the JFK stuff just skate by.

Yeah, I haven't really been following the releases because it was never something I was all that wrapped up in. As I understand it though, interest in the information was less about revealing something along the lines of the Federal Reserve CTs, blaming the Soviets, Cubans, Israelis, military industrial complex or CTs about the Birchers, and more about a cover up of CIA incompetence in dealing with Oswald as a threat.

 

[Fawlty]

Not to mention that JFK CTs are stupid, too.

I mean, they're more understandable because people don't want to believe that important world events can be caused by a single loser, while the Rich CT is driven entirely by partisanship and online trolling. But I don't like just letting the JFK stuff just skate by.

Somebody brought up the point to me the other day that a lot of CTing (like the Paddock shooting) is about participation, beyond the disquiet caused by lone nuts and our lack of control. That people want to be a part of it because it's exciting to feel like a part of it. The Seth Rich stuff seems to be about 90% fantasy/participation. Maybe not 90%. But a lot. It's all wrapped up in the tribal stuff and can't really be separated. But it's not out of concern for the truth.

 

[Fawlty]

It shows how far up Hillary's ass you are. The DNC/Hitlery have been exposed for their complete corruption and you're still pretending that they aren't rotten enough to create a fake dossier to support a fake narrative in their ongoing effort to #RESIST.

How fucking naive and gullible are you? Hillary has destroyed the DNC and you're pretending that these criminals are somehow beyond reproach? Pathetic.

What we know:

1. The DNC claims they were hacked by Russians who stole their emails & gave them to Wikileaks.
2. The DNC/Clinton Campaign has been exposed as corrupt liars and cheats in the Democratic primary election.
3. Timestamps that indicate transfer rates prove the stolen emails were downloaded locally (likely possibility to usb drive/stick).
4. The DNC refused to give the server to the FBI.
5. Seth Rich had IT access to the DNC server.
6. Seth Rich was murdered.
7. Julian Assange has stated the leaked emails didn't come from Russia or any state actor.
8. Wikileaks has a solid track record regarding the legitimacy of its leaks; none have ever been shown to be fraudulent.
9. Julian Assange intimated, but did not definitively state, that (murdered) Seth Rich was the source of the leaked emails.

This is certainly a case that is tied closely enough to the DNC/Hillary campaign & it's confirmed corruption, to warrant suspicion & thorough investigation. Let's not pretend that they aren't mired in unethical and criminal behavior.

Thank Zeus Almighty that sociopath Hitlery was defeated. Can you imagine someone with so much entrenched power and so corrupt, solidifying that level of Orwellian corruption throughout our entire government. Jesus we dodged a bullet on that one.

And guess what assholes? I wasn't even a Trump supporter! But Hillary was the entrenched corrupt establishment candidate in that election. I would have like to see Rand Paul vs. Bernie. And I'm no socialist, but Bernie's top 2 issues speak to me: wanting to overturn Citizens United, and taking on Wall St. regulatory capture and corruption. You idiots defending Hitlery and the DNC are pathetic and only making yourselves look at as ethically compromised as Donna Brazile and friends. Time to man up and disavow the villiany of the Clinton Crime Syndicate.

This is you arbitrarily connecting dots to make the picture you want to make, and you're leaping between Wall Street and Bernie and Assange and the DNC to do it. It's mental illness, man. You should also smarten up and realize that Assange is fucking with you. If he had the goods, we would have known a long fucking time ago. You are hilariously easy to bluff. You are Julian's bitch.

 

[Rockapotomuss]

This is you arbitrarily connecting dots to make the picture you want to make, and you're leaping between Wall Street and Bernie and Assange and the DNC to do it. It's mental illness, man. You should also smarten up and realize that Assange is fucking with you. If he had the goods, we would have known a long fucking time ago. You are hilariously easy to bluff. You are Julian's bitch.

If Assange could prove Seth Rich was his source, why doesn't he? Assange says it's to protect the anonymity of his sources. I don't buy that as a sufficient basis, since Seth Rich is dead, who cares if he keeps his anonymity? It could be that Assange is full of shit. Possibly, but why would Assange risk his credibility for nothing? It could be that if Assange revealed Seth Rich as a source, to prove it would expose Assange to criminal charges. That makes sense. One day, we will likely find out, one way or the other. When Assange has nothing to lose, he will likely spill any remaining beans he has left.

 

[Fawlty]

If Assange could prove Seth Rich was his source, why doesn't he? Assange says it's to protect the anonymity of his sources. I don't buy that as a sufficient basis, since Seth Rich is dead, who cares if he keeps his anonymity? It could be that Assange is full of shit. Possibly, but why would Assange risk his credibility for nothing? It could be that if Assange revealed Seth Rich as a source, to prove it would expose Assange to criminal charges. That makes sense. One day, we will likely find out. When Assange has nothing to lose, he will likely spill any remaining beans he has left.

That's the exact opposite of protecting the anonymity of his sources. That would be bringing attention to his source. Christ, do you guys even fucking think?

One day!
Any day now!
This is it!
etc

 

[Rockapotomuss]

That's the exact opposite of protecting the anonymity of his sources. That would be bringing attention to his source. Christ, do you guys even fucking think?

One day!
Any day now!
This is it!
etc

Did you read my post correctly?

 

[Pickle Rick]

If Assange could prove Seth Rich was his source, why doesn't he? Assange says it's to protect the anonymity of his sources. I don't buy that as a sufficient basis, since Seth Rich is dead, who cares if he keeps his anonymity? It could be that Assange is full of shit. Possibly, but why would Assange risk his credibility for nothing? It could be that if Assange revealed Seth Rich as a source, to prove it would expose Assange to criminal charges. That makes sense. One day, we will likely find out, one way or the other. When Assange has nothing to lose, he will likely spill any remaining beans he has left.

wow... thats some high level CT you got going

 

[Rockapotomuss]

wow... thats some high level CT you got going

If by CT you mean critical thinking, yes, yes it is.

 

[fartJokes]

This is you arbitrarily connecting dots to make the picture you want to make, and you're leaping between Wall Street and Bernie and Assange and the DNC to do it. It's mental illness, man. You should also smarten up and realize that Assange is fucking with you. If he had the goods, we would have known a long fucking time ago. You are hilariously easy to bluff. You are Julian's bitch.

So Julian Assange & Wikileaks is the corrupt liar here, not Hillary?

Astounding.

 

[Fawlty]

Did you read my post correctly?

Yes, you're trying to hedge and it stinks.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Somebody brought up the point to me the other day that a lot of CTing (like the Paddock shooting) is about participation, beyond the disquiet caused by lone nuts and our lack of control. That people want to be a part of it because it's exciting to feel like a part of it. The Seth Rich stuff seems to be about 90% fantasy/participation. Maybe not 90%. But a lot. It's all wrapped up in the tribal stuff and can't really be separated. But it's not out of concern for the truth.

That's a fair point, too. And it's clear people who make those kinds of claims know that they aren't literally true.

 

[Fawlty]

So Julian Assange & Wikileaks is the corrupt liar here, not Hillary?

Astounding.

This doesn't have anything to do with Hillary. To presuppose that it does, you have to already believe the conspiracy theory, which means you couldn't give a midget fuck about the truth.

 

[Rockapotomuss]

This doesn't have anything to do with Hillary. To presuppose that it does, you have to already believe the conspiracy theory, which means you couldn't give a midget fuck about the truth.

To be fair, it has to do with the DNC, which we now know was actually the Hillary campaign.

 

[Rockapotomuss]

That's the exact opposite of protecting the anonymity of his sources. That would be bringing attention to his source. Christ, do you guys even fucking think?

One day!
Any day now!
This is it!
etc

As I said, Assange says it's to protect the anonymity of his sources. I don't buy that as a sufficient basis, since Seth Rich is dead, who cares if he keeps his anonymity?

 

[Fawlty]

To be fair, it has to do with the DNC, which we now know was actually the Hillary campaign.

Fair to the conspiracy theory that is believed without evidence, maybe. Since it's not evidence, but pure circumstance, it does fit the CTer's preferred model of investigation.

 

[Rockapotomuss]

Fair to the conspiracy theory that is believed without evidence, maybe. Since it's not evidence, but pure circumstance, it does fit the CTer's preferred model of investigation.

It's circumstantial evidence, sure. Which is why I'm not convinced Seth Rich had anything to do with the DNC leak. But given the evidence we do have, I'm not prepared to rule it out either. The burden of proof lays with those making the claim, but I'm also open to someone proving, or even providing evidence, the DNC hack was actually the Russians acting without inside help, which would disprove the Seth Rich theory. That doesn't exist either.

 

[Fawlty]

It's circumstantial evidence, sure. Which is why I'm not convinced Seth Rich had anything to do with the DNC leak. But given the evidence we do have, I'm not prepared to rule it out either. The burden of proof lays with those making the claim, but I'm also open to someone proving, or even providing evidence, the DNC hack was actually the Russians acting without inside help, which would disprove the Seth Rich theory. That doesn't exist either.

No, not evidence. Only circumstance. Circumstantial evidence would be somebody asking Seth to stay really late at work, and that being the night he was killed. If I work for Kinko's and I'm killed, that's not circumstantial evidence that Kinko's killed me. Unless you already believe, like you do, that Kinko's are murderous villains.