- Joined
- Nov 21, 2005
- Messages
- 8,160
- Reaction score
- 130
It appears you married up.My wife watches Judge judy also
It appears you married up.My wife watches Judge judy also
It appears you married up.
These people just make up laws and rules ad-hoc so they can keep denying anything is going on in these investigations, and that Trump is hiding stuff and it's about to get uncovered.This is also not correct. Most business records are admissible in some form. "Legal" docs are easier to get in, and a party signing a document makes it easier to get in, but that's not a hard limit.
I just came across a case in which an award get cut by 2.6 million (from 3.3) because one party was only able to provide documentation-in the form of personal notes-for $700k of their costs. A great example I saw had a bunch of claims. Some got in with as little as an email and hand written notes, but the party outright ditched one where there wasn't even that.
So what was your name before you got banned and had to make a new account?Trump Derangement Syndrome has taken over their minds.
You've successfully proven that credibility depends upon the individual. Yours is zero.Sure they do. I wrote some notes just now. Turns out I own Microsoft
They will corroborate other testimony and evidence. I doubt they're the foundation of any case on their own.I think it would have been better for McCabe and Comey to have recorded the conversations rather than documented them on memos. Trump's lawyers could argue these memos have biased content subjected to the words of its writers. If Mueller wants to build a solid case, he needs more concrete evidence than simply notes from individuals fired by Trump.
I think it would have been better for McCabe and Comey to have recorded the conversations rather than documented them on memos. Trump's lawyers could argue these memos have biased content subjected to the words of its writers. If Mueller wants to build a solid case, he needs more concrete evidence than simply notes from individuals fired by Trump.
I have notes on @HomerThompson
I claimed it so it must be true and there is no possible way I'd make it up because I don't like him.
dude, you couldn't get a job cleaning shitters at the FBI, let alone be the chief.
I'm going to go ahead and assume I have a more professional job than you but ok. And you're right about one thing, I would never be a big enough piece of shit to be the head of the FBI
Dude, beyond you not having the academic background or intellect to qualify for the FBI, a silly fucker like you couldn't pass the psych tests to get into the FBI.
Lol!!! I'd say the same for you. Are we supposed to get into a flame war now? Some of us actually do have professional careers and judging by your eager willingness to draw this out, get the last word and lie about a poster you know little about, I'm assuming you're a student with a shitty job, or you lie on sherdog of about your career.
Lol!!! I'd say the same for you. Are we supposed to get into a flame war now? Some of us actually do have professional careers and judging by your eager willingness to draw this out, get the last word and lie about a poster you know little about, I'm assuming you're a student with a shitty job, or you lie on sherdog of about your career.
Its damn funny seeing liberals behind the FBI, Trump is so great that he unites everyone.
I have a memo saying you have the Hoffa body. Turning you in now. It’s true. I wrote it.You've successfully proven that credibility depends upon the individual. Yours is zero.
Its damn funny watching "law and order" conservatives trash the FBI.
Most conservatives are against big government and pro police, but FBI fits big govt.
And now you proved you have nothing to contribute by repeating the same dumb shit.I have a memo saying you have the Hoffa body. Turning you in now. It’s true. I wrote it.