- Joined
- Aug 20, 2009
- Messages
- 40,765
- Reaction score
- 21,635
Stick this up your irrelevant.His firing was recommended by the FBI. That's it. Your heavily partisan conspiracy theories are irrelevant.
Stick this up your irrelevant.His firing was recommended by the FBI. That's it. Your heavily partisan conspiracy theories are irrelevant.
What's the correct way to respond to your idiotic trolling?
Yeah but they’d have no legal weight if they can’t be verified against something. That’s still just your word
That can @Quipling doesn't even know bird law.Whoa! Back up, Quipling. For your own sake just step off. I know you're a lawyer IRL, but now you're dealing with an internet lawyer.
"Andrew McCabe is more likely than not to be a witness against the Attorney General’s boss, the President of the United States. I think that firing him in that environment could very well be interpreted as an effort to diminish his effectiveness as a witness. What’s that called? Obstruction of justice."
"I have to tell you though, terminating someone a day before their pension kicks in - after twenty-on years of service, the number two person in the FBI - strikes me as spiteful and politically reckless. And it's reckless because this person, McCabe is about to testify against Jeff Sessions' boss, the President of the United States. Why would you fire him in this environment?"
Six of them frantically taking notes of his sick behaviour and the seventh tweeting #metoo
That can @Quipling doesn't even know bird law.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
― Mark Twain
Memos were taken, but they were completely illegible, appeared to be just a bunch of chicken scratch.
You forgot:Trumpbots with law degrees from Trump University : memos don't mean anything in court.
Real Lawyers: yes they do
Trumpbots:
Memos were taken, but they were completely illegible, appeared to be just a bunch of chicken scratch.