- Joined
- Dec 28, 2013
- Messages
- 13,380
- Reaction score
- 5
More Europe news. who cares
I think that one was in Germany or Russia.Didn't some dude get all jacked up over there for holocaust denial? Nothing new.
Whilst i realise the above resonses are obvious bait.
I am so fucked off, there are people here that actually mean the above. so, sooo pissed off.
It reads like an onion piece. This slow evolution of liberalism into fascism is terrifying tbhIt's the natural conclusion of political correctness. No biggie, right?
I wouldn't be opposed to bringing back the death penalty for this one.
Make an example out of this guy.
blah blah blah you are missing the point,We've never had free speech or anything close to it. We have never been able to say whatever the fuck we wanted without consequence. You can't yell fire in an elevator. You can be punished for libel, defamation, incitement, and a litany of other things. Obscenity laws are common.
'The Line' has always been blurry, and it has always been argued over. And I suspect in the modern ages, when it is so easy to instantly reach millions with your speech, and there is no way whatsoever to limit who receives said speech, we could find speech getting curtailed more. At least in those mediums. There are ramifications to that, and not all of them are bad.
Interestingly, during the period of time in western civilization that we had the 'most' free, speech, it was to some degree kept in check by the fact that if someone took affront to something you said, it was not only legal, but not all that uncommon for them to challenge you to a duel, often to the death, unless you sufficiently appeased them. Many of our historical luminaries killed people, and were killed, this very way.
If 'real' freedom is what your after, I'll sign up to go back to the 'good ole' days if you will. Then we would be arguing on Sherdog why some Jewish guy whose parents died in the holocaust murdered (sorry-legally killed) this guy in a duel over a harmless joke.
And there it is in black and white. You don't have to have broken any laws to be charged with an offence and potentially go to prison. All it takes is for someone to decide what your motives were, what your thoughts were basically and away you go. This is extremely disturbing.
They're cult members worshiping at the altar of feelings. Tolerated by hypocrites on the left who have no compunctions about betraying their principles in exchange for support from the enemies of their enemy. Whatever they may be, liberals they are not.It reads like an onion piece. This slow evolution of liberalism into fascism is terrifying tbh
blah blah blah you are missing the point,
if this guy was a legit Nazi sympathizer trying to spread something hateful then I agree with your view and him facing consequences.
but you really want to extend this to jokes where there was no ill intent?
Like I said, statist boot licker. Absolutely terrifying. That you think imprisonment for free speech is totally fine and doesn't effect you, speaks volumes. Carry on comrade.
Brain-dead boot lickers that want state force enacted upon those that say things they disagree with are terrifying. The tens of millions of people that were slaughtered in the 20th century ended up there because of people like you.You must be very easily terrified.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ed-after-teaching-girlfriends-dog-to-perform/
Seriously some people need to learn how to take a fucking joke.
Brain-dead boot lickers that want state force enacted upon those that say things they disagree with are terrifying. The tens of millions of people that were slaughtered in the 20th century ended up there because of people like you.
I don't know all the facts or this dudes history, and neither do you....
Sorry but I don't need to get into all that.
Your very first comment is the answer to me. Yes neither of us know his story and based on that and all we know to date is the bad joke I don't want to see the jack boots of gov't getting involved.
if any of the other stuff you say is in play then the gov't is reacting to and acting upon that and not the joke and that is fine.
But you were basically celebrating the gov't getting involved over a joke and suggesting he deserved ti and not this new narrative of 'what if there is more'.