Discussion in 'The War Room' started by jantar, Mar 20, 2017.
Good propaganda mixes the right about of education and the right amount of entertainment
Theres no place for nuance and reason on the War Room.
We fear monger 24/7.
Has every European country been comprimised by globalism/cultural Marxism? So sad to see this happening, and even sadder to see people support this. Is multiculturalism so important that you would risk the safety of your women and children for it? Sweden/Germany/France and now Italy apparently think so.
I'm having a tough time believing this story.
It's all part of the long con toward one world government. Break down societies ideas of national identify, personal freedom, person accountability, intellectual/spiritual/social/economic independence...
The end game of this effort toward globalism, marxism, socialism, liberalism, hedonism is the eventual institution of one world government.
Reminds me of people who pose their babies with their pit bulls to prove they aren't dangerous. You're just asking for it and endangering other people to prove a shaky theory.
I looked into it. Pedibus is an accompanying service where 2 adults typically escort up to 25 children from a starting position to the school. No parents.
Sounds like it should be called Pedobus.
So it's something in the middle between the two extreme scenarios.
Not sure how I feel about that.
Female migrants, I would say yes.
Unvetted male migrants I would say no.
But that would probably go for all unvetted males. The migrant part is not the most important factor the unvetted one is IMO.
How can you reason with someone who is delusional/ indifferent enough to propose this idea?
Debate and logic no longer become a viable form of resistance when this level of retardation is in play....
That's sexist; German liberals will protest. Are you saying men and women aren't equal? Are you saying Muslim men are rapists? How DARE you deny Italian children to enrich their lives by holding hands with an unvetted Muslim man.
I meant Italy sry
Well, I can certainly see the benefits for children to be around people from different backgrounds.
So I don't have an issue with the basic idea of migrants walking children to school assuming its safe and done right.
I am just concerned about people reading an article without many details and immediately assume the worst.
Specially, considering the source in this case.
Sort of like the same SJW warriors do when they read some stuff on the internet and immediately assume the worst.
Without looking into the details.
The belief that women aren't sex offenders or at least often in cahoots with sex offenders as procurers is misguided. While men might be the ones running trafficking rings and such, women are always employed by them for exactly the reason that they're seen as more trustworthy and benign by society. It's not a good idea to have some strange, unvetted person of any "gender" walk around with kids. This program is going to actually attract the worst types of people who will see it as a great opportunity to get unsupervised access to kids.
In some cases, they should. Not everything is the same.
The articles I've read don't mention gender so it's fair to assume male migrants will participate as well. This is typical of a leftist administration, they would rather put children in danger so they can preserve their delusions rather than admit that male migrants are more dangerous than females.
It's culture too. Why do you trust someone from your town more than a stranger from another country. Because they grew up with the same values, they follow the same unwritten rules. You have no idea what a male Muslim or African from a war-zone is thinking. You can't trust him to act ethically. You can't even trust him to not act murderous.
An awful lot of female teachers are caught having sex with students in public schools. Most often, they do not face jail time for it. The idea that women are substantially safer than men has little basis.
it's ok for them but I bet none of their kids are going to be participated on this....
I was referring more to the fact that a woman usually won't feel the sudden urge to rape a child.
Or in case there is any issue the two other people could overwhelm the female compared to a male.
But yeah I agree on the unvetted part. I just don't see a female turning sex offender in this case.
Separate names with a comma.