- Joined
- Sep 7, 2015
- Messages
- 5,731
- Reaction score
- 884
I challenge you to present TWO OBJECTIVE CRITICISMS of Conors performance on this board.
You cant. Its all slanted bullshit. Alot of it isnt even grounded in truth
1. He’s a one-dimensional striker who relies on a big-left. (Kinda like if Dan Henderson was a more skilled striker, but had no wrestling.)
2. His success has come against mostly smaller men.
3. He has unusually bad cardio, for a lightweight.
4. He will struggle against anyone with a good ground game.
5. His performances against Nate Diaz, a 20-10 fighter, were not GOAT-worthy. (Also fighting Nate a WW was not some crazy bold move. Nate is a solid top ten LW, with tremendous holes in his game.)
6. He’s a very good fighter. He’s just not a great one.