- Joined
- Jun 19, 2016
- Messages
- 4,237
- Reaction score
- 0
That right there
What revision are you speaking of?
I saw the fight on TV with my own two eyes
Woodley didn't beat anything down
Last edited:
That right there
What revision are you speaking of?
One huge ass paragraph, then two small sentences. That deserves Woodley level criticism.
That right there
I saw the fight on TV with my own two eyes
Woodley didn't beat anything down
Anyone criticizing Woodley is insane and probably supports stupid money fights like Bisping/GSP and Conor/Diaz. Woodley has fought four times in one year and defended against real number one contenders. Giving Woodley no gratitude for defending like a real champion should do is only going to encourage him and the other champions to duck the hard fights and pursue only the easy money fights. No I don't care if you think his fights were boring. Not all fights are going to be barn burners and his opponents have just as much blame if not more in some cases. Stephen Thompson is supposed to be the top striker in the division but he did fuck all in both fights (and I was rooting for him!). The only fight that I give him a little criticism is the Maia fight but I can't blame him for being careful with a guy who chokes everyone.
Really sick of interim belts. If the UFC respected the real belts then interim belts would basically never be necessary at all.
Lol now you're trying to reframe the narrative and explain what "you meant" and what was "obvious"Ok so now apparently we are going to have a subjective argument when I think my point was very obvious. The most exciting part of the fight was Woodley DROPPING Thompson, pounding on him, then getting a deep submission. That's what happened. I'm not going to have a retarded argument about what to call it. That was the most "beat down" part of that fight.
Lol now you're trying to reframe the narrative and explain what "you meant" and what was "obvious"
If it's so subjective why are you repeatedly attempting to emphasize that what you're saying about the fight is the truth?I don't know why you are grilling me about something that is subjective. Thompson was getting beat up and nearly lost. What exactly is the point you are trying to make?
If it's so subjective why are you repeatedly attempting to emphasize that what you're saying about the fight is the truth?
Lol the phrase "beatdown" isn't subjective at all....it's undoubtedly definitiveYou started in with this because of the phrase "beat down" which is subjective. So I then got more specific with what actually happened. So I really have no idea what you are crying about.
If you disagree then why don't you tell me what happened in that fight and maybe we can agree on something or just agree to disagree.
Lol the phrase "beatdown" isn't subjective at all....it's undoubtedly definitive
Landing one awkward right and chasing a guy around a cage after he gets up,
most certainly isn't one.....in any context of the word
Sounds more like you're lowering your standards and changeing definitions to fit the narrative you want
<45>What exactly do you think subjective means? It's anything that is based on personal opinions. So why don't you explain to me how Stephen Thompson was factually not "beat down" when he was dropped and nearly submitted. I'll bite.
<45>
There's a line between being subjective and being ignorant to the truth and ignoring conventional thinking
I just about guarantee that woodley himself wouldnt believe that getting hit with a punch and immediately getting up or pulling out of the choke would qualify as a beat down by any means
Anyone criticizing Woodley is insane and probably supports stupid money fights like Bisping/GSP and Conor/Diaz. Woodley has fought four times in one year and defended against real number one contenders. Giving Woodley no gratitude for defending like a real champion should do is only going to encourage him and the other champions to duck the hard fights and pursue only the easy money fights. No I don't care if you think his fights were boring. Not all fights are going to be barn burners and his opponents have just as much blame if not more in some cases. Stephen Thompson is supposed to be the top striker in the division but he did fuck all in both fights (and I was rooting for him!). The only fight that I give him a little criticism is the Maia fight but I can't blame him for being careful with a guy who chokes everyone.
Really sick of interim belts. If the UFC respected the real belts then interim belts would basically never be necessary at all.
shut the hell up with that
Haha well think your words out before you backtrack and edit what you "mean" againIgnorant to what truth? Respond to my edit above because so far the only one who is misrepresenting what happened is you. I was never talking about "one punch " lol.
Haha well think your words out before you backtrack and edit what you "mean" again
I was talking about the one punch repeatedly because it's obvious that was the only decently landed and clean blow he threw in the last minute.
That flurry did fuck all