- Joined
- Mar 2, 2007
- Messages
- 15,357
- Reaction score
- 2,687
If you look at the best times for the 200m vs 100m, it appears that you actually reach top speed post-100m (for instance when Michael Johnson got the world record for the 200 meters at the 1996 Summer Olympics, his time of 19.32 was comparatively faster than Donovan Bailey's world record 9.84 set at the same Olympics). But sport-specific, 40 yards is probably the best measure of speed and explosiveness on the football field.
Incorrect. Top speed is achieved early and lasts only 20m or so. It also depends largely on the duration on ones acceleration in accordance with the power of athletes to prolong said accel. The 200m and 400m races require tremendous speed endurance. To run a proper 200m/400m race you actually have to hit top speed early so you can enter your running form early and hit top speed while in the bend that way the kick gets you sustaining the speed endurance at the straight of the track and not the bend. It's harder to hold onto form in bend.
To hit top speed quick you just need to pop right up from the angle and into your upright sprint position. That will rapidly eliminate your ability to accelerate any further its just momentum and the endurance to hold onto the speed you have generated for yourself as it quickly deteriorates as you approach the finish line.
Kids or any slow person will accelerate very fast and enter top speed the quickest. The rest is speed endurance where they would gas into oblivion and thus lose the race.
For the 40 yard the goal is to accel very fast with as much power as possible in order to hit the top speed early and get that magical sub 4.2 time. But a better 40yd means a slow 100m. If you watch Coleman video i put out earlier you will see that coleman pops upright early. He knows he has to cut accel short to maximize his ability to hit top speed early enough to hit that fast number. In the 100 he would do the inverse.