International Dalai Lama says 'Europe belongs to Europeans'

Whites are thee world minority. Soon, it's going to be a comically small group. Reality.

I'm used to it, tbh. I've lived in Phoenix since I was teenager, it's already majority-minority and my high school was literally only 8% white. The particular area of the city I live is maybe 15% or less and prior to the 1970s, was the only part of the city in which African-Americans and Hispanics were allowed to buy property. I could live up in Scottsdale away from all the colored people if I wanted to, it's just conveniently close my work place and a couple miles directly west of my university. I hate bullshit commutes.
 
I don't know where you see it but I see the poor me attitude plenty from the very same people who love to lecture everybody else on personal responsibility. When it comes to themselves of course they always have a really good reason why they shouldn't take responsibility but instead it's poor me it's "the other guys" fault. "The other guy" depending on what day it is and what type of responsibility is being ducked could be immigrants, the deep state, liberals, the media, Affirmative Action, reverse racism ect.

Well those who vote for people who bring in tons of third worlders and degrade the QOL of their host countries certainly should take some responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Those who oversee these operations should as well. Thankfully I'm not a part of that demographic.

At least we're in agreement then- about this and about pathetic whiny babies who always cry about race with their "poor me" attitudes.
 
The EU is a machine working to destroy europe as we know it

Watch Italy, we italians as population voted against EU bullshit, former merkel/eu lapdog Renzi got wrecked at elections

Now everyday our government (absolutely not perfect but chosen by people) is being daily attacked from inside our outside... eu, other nations leaders, international and national media, judges, onu (lol), the usual left circus, the fucking president of the republic lol

This government does'nt even have that deep roots, formed essentially by 2 former rivals who draw at elections(and even more unstable now that one is getting huge boost in popularity ovet the other), and still get opposed at any chance like if was some sort of dangerous powerhouse only because it's against eu bullshit

Eu is'nt afraid of italy, is afraid that it may become a voice that make wake up other europeans in already submitted countries

Too bad the anti eu crap in france had a bad candidate in Le Pen, because if another important eu leader was on our side we had chance to fuck eu shit up
But they cucked themselves and voted macron instead understand while shitty Le Pen was the lesser evil in the bigger game

The change happened in subtle way but now national leaders seem supposed to put eu obedience over theyr own people loyalty

This mean european people vote will keep mean less and less, yet somehow we get only daily reminder about "the danger of nationalism" lol

One day history will laugh at how europeans let theyr world to be dismatled
 
i do think there is a "Culture problem" with regard to education in poor communities in the US. but comparing japan to the US education system is not apples to apples. poor people here are more desperate than poor people in most any other developed country. desperate people have problems, and share problems with their kids.

I'm going to say it.. *inhales deeply* Africans are different than Japanese.. *exhales* I hope everybody is ok.
 
I'm going to say it.. *inhales deeply* Africans are different than Japanese.. *exhales* I hope everybody is ok.

200w.webp
 
They hate us cause they ain't us. Not a chance in hell, what is hated is the discrimination and more recently is the pathetic poor me attitude.

Embrace it, I heard our tears taste really good. It isn't going anywhere either I'm afraid, because as said in the Michael Moore thread: when white people become minority, they turn into an actual special interest group. Even the weirdo ones who wank off to the idea of the white minorty now will be on some Charlotte's Web "I don't wanna die!" Wilbur shit.



{<jordan}
 
I'm used to it, tbh. I've lived in Phoenix since I was teenager, it's already majority-minority and my high school was literally only 8% white. The particular area of the city I live is maybe 15% or less and prior to the 1970s, was the only part of the city in which African-Americans and Hispanics were allowed to buy property. I could live up in Scottsdale away from all the colored people if I wanted to, it's just conveniently close my work place and a couple miles directly west of my university. I hate bullshit commutes.
I wonder if such legal restrictions had lasting effects on these communities' ability to build and transfer wealth across generations...

Nah, they're probably just lazy amirite?
 
Yes the world has spent the past 500 years catering to white peoples every whim and desire and now that finally others are making their presence felt, now that the world realizes that white people aren't the only people in the world with whims and desires people like yourself are scared at what this means.

Europe itself is not being destroyed due to mass immigration, the Europe you are comfortable with is being destroyed due to mass immigration. There is a big difference whether you realize it or not.

Wakandans say the darndest things.

<{cruzshake}>
 
The EU is a machine working to destroy europe as we know it

Watch Italy, we italians as population voted against EU bullshit, former merkel/eu lapdog Renzi got wrecked at elections

Now everyday our government (absolutely not perfect but chosen by people) is being daily attacked from inside our outside... eu, other nations leaders, international and national media, judges, onu (lol), the usual left circus, the fucking president of the republic lol

This government does'nt even have that deep roots, formed essentially by 2 former rivals who draw at elections(and even more unstable now that one is getting huge boost in popularity ovet the other), and still get opposed at any chance like if was some sort of dangerous powerhouse only because it's against eu bullshit

Eu is'nt afraid of italy, is afraid that it may become a voice that make wake up other europeans in already submitted countries

Too bad the anti eu crap in france had a bad candidate in Le Pen, because if another important eu leader was on our side we had chance to fuck eu shit up
But they cucked themselves and voted macron instead understand while shitty Le Pen was the lesser evil in the bigger game

The change happened in subtle way but now national leaders seem supposed to put eu obedience over theyr own people loyalty

This mean european people vote will keep mean less and less, yet somehow we get only daily reminder about "the danger of nationalism" lol

One day history will laugh at how europeans let theyr world to be dismatled

EU strategy is to dissolve the peoples, cultures, identities, nations, etc of Europe into a mishmash. To essentially globalize the population. The idea of distinct nations and European peoples with roots and histories they are trying to abolish.

It makes sense in a twisted sort of way, as a way of establishing a super government. Take away the things people tend to fight for, and they will eventually see the super government as acceptable or even desirable.
 
I can honestly say I’ve never given a shit what that goon thinks I’m not going to start now.

It is a controversial statement, seeing as how popular he is in leftist circles.

What he is saying though is in line with core Buddhist principles. Buddhism, at its core, is centered around a "middle path" in everything. Along with attempting to live in a way that both causes the least harm to others, and prevents the suffering of others as much as is reasonable.

Some asylum seekers staying and being welcomed in by their host countries, while others go back to rebuild their home land and help their fellow country men is pretty much in line with that thought.

Well, he's right.
Also I doubt he likes muslims after they blew up some of the rarest Buddhist statues and sacred places.

Unlikely. The Dalai Lama was assisted early in his life by Muslim merchants who offered him to travel with them for protection.
From 1936 the Hui 'Ma Clique' Muslim warlord Ma Bufang ruled Qinghai as its governor under the nominal authority of the Republic of Chinacentral government.[20] According to an interview with the 14th Dalai Lama, in the 1930s, Ma Bufang had seized this north-east corner of Amdo in the name of Chiang Kai-shek's weak government and incorporated it into the Chinese province of Qinghai.[21] Before going to Taktser, Kewtsang had gone to Ma Bufang to pay his respects.[17] When Ma Bufang heard a candidate had been found in Taktser, he had the family brought to him in Xining.[22] He first demanded proof that the boy was the Dalai Lama but the Lhasa government, though informed by Kewtsang that this was the one, told Kewtsang to say he had to go to Lhasa for further tests with other candidates. They knew that if he was declared to be the Dalai Lama, the Chinese government would insist on sending a large army escort with him, which would then stay in Lhasa and refuse to budge.[23] Ma Bufang, together with Kumbum Monastery, then refused to allow him to depart unless he was declared to be the Dalai Lama, but withdrew this demand in return for 100,000 Chinese dollars ransom in silver to be shared amongst them, to let them go to Lhasa.[23][24] Kewtsang managed to raise this, but the family was only allowed to move from Xining to Kumbum when a further demand was made for another 330,000 dollars ransom: one hundred thousand each for government officials, the commander-in-chief, and the Kumbum Monastery; twenty thousand for the escort; and only ten thousand for Ma Bufang himself, he said.[25]

Two years of diplomatic wrangling followed before it was accepted by Lhasa that the ransom had to be paid to avoid the Chinese getting involved and escorting him to Lhasa with a large army.[26] Meanwhile, the boy was kept at Kumbum where two of his brothers were already studying as monks and recognised incarnate lamas.[27] The payment of 300,000 silver dollars was then advanced by Muslim traders en route to Mecca in a large caravan via Lhasa. They paid Ma Bufang on behalf of the Tibetan government against promissory notes to be redeemed, with interest, in Lhasa.[27][28] The 20,000-dollar fee for an escort was dropped, since the Muslim merchants invited them to join their caravan for protection; Ma Bufang sent 20 of his soldiers with them and was paid from both sides since the Chinese government granted him another 50,000 dollars for the expenses of the journey. Furthermore, the Indian government helped the Tibetans raise the ransom funds by affording them import concessions.[28]

Released from Kumbum, on 21 July 1939 the party travelled across Tibet in an epic journey to Lhasa in the large Muslim caravan with Lhamo Thondup, now 4 years old, riding with his brother Lobsang in a special palanquin carried by two mules, two years after being discovered. As soon as they were out of Ma Bufang's area, he was officially declared to be the 14th Dalai Lama by the Central Government of Tibet and after ten weeks of travel he arrived in Lhasa on 8 October 1939.[29] The ordination (pabbajja) and giving of the monastic name of Tenzin Gyatso were handled by Reting Rinpoche. There was very limited Chinese involvement at this time.[30]

Also, the Dalai Lama has criticized Buddhists who were attacking Muslims.

n April 2013, the Dalai Lama openly criticised Buddhist monks' attacks on Muslims in Myanmar "Buddha always teaches us about forgiveness, tolerance, compassion. If from one corner of your mind, some emotion makes you want to hit, or want to kill, then please remember Buddha's faith. We are followers of Buddha." He said that "All problems must be solved through dialogue, through talk. The use of violence is outdated, and never solves problems."[137] In May 2013, He said "Really, killing people in the name of religion is unthinkable, very sad."[138] In May 2015, the Dalai Lama publicly called on Myanmar's Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi to do more to help the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, claiming that he had previously urged her to address the plight of the Rohingya in private during two separate meetings and that she had resisted his urging.[139]




He’s tripping balls from too much meditating and a vegetarian diet

Actually the Dalai Lama does eat meat regularly, by orders of a doctor.

The problem is that a lot of lefties romanticize Buddhism and fail to understand that many sects of Buddhism can be just as extremely dogmatic, homophobic, abusive and misogynistic as the worst religions. There is a lot of sexual and physical abuse that goes on in Buddhist monasteries.

The Dalai Lama (who is not the authority on all of Buddhism just his particular sect) explains that homosexuality is considered a deviant act according to Buddhist scriptures. If you want to be a good Buddhist, then you have to refrain from homosexuality as well as certain sexual acts in a male-female marriage like oral and anal sex.

Compassionate or confusing? The Dalai Lama on same-sex marriage

The real difference between the two comments is that the latter is addressed to Buddhists, while the former is not. As he told ‘The Age’ in a 1999 interview:

They [his Californian followers] want me to condone homosexuality. But I am a Buddhist and, for a Buddhist, a relationship between two men is wrong. Some sexual conduct in marriage is also wrong," he says. “For example, using one's mouth and the other hole.” “This too is wrong," he adds, shaking his hand up and down vigorously. I look at the translator, perplexed. “Masturbation, madam,'' he says. The Dalai Lama laughs as I blush. “If an individual has no faith, that is a different matter," he says. “If two men really love each other and are not religious, then that is OK by me."


Much to the dismay of flaky Westerners, it turns out that the Dalai Lama’s religious beliefs are just as sexually limiting as those of pretty much any other major religious sect. The real difference between the Pope and the Dalai Lama is that, for reasons of pragmatism or of doctrine, the Dalai Lama maintains a sharp distinction between morality for Buddhists, and morality for the rest of us. His latest comments show that the Dalai Lama still maintains this double-standard for believers, stating that:

“People who have belief or who have special traditions, then you should follow according to your own tradition. Like Buddhism, there are different kinds of sexual misconduct, so you should follow properly.”

His view on homosexuality, and sexual acts even between hetero couples, is pretty much in line with Buddhist teaching also. Basically Buddhism sees over indulgence of the pleasures from the physical senses to be a cause of emotional suffering. And emotional suffering is what causes the cycle of life, suffering, death and rebirth to do it again. Basically what I think he is saying is that any sexual act, or use of the sex organs, that is purely for the sake of physical pleasure should be avoided. Since same sex couples can only engage in sex for pleasure purposes, and not procreation, then it should be avoided. Just like how heteros shouldn't engage in sex acts outside of procreation. Essentially when you experience physical pleasures too often, you begin to seek them all the time. When you don't get it, you become emotionally distressed. And that emotional distress prevents reaching enlightenment.
 
His view on homosexuality, and sexual acts even between hetero couples, is pretty much in line with Buddhist teaching also. Basically Buddhism sees over indulgence of the pleasures from the physical senses to be a cause of emotional suffering. And emotional suffering is what causes the cycle of life, suffering, death and rebirth to do it again. Basically what I think he is saying is that any sexual act, or use of the sex organs, that is purely for the sake of physical pleasure should be avoided. Since same sex couples can only engage in sex for pleasure purposes, and not procreation, then it should be avoided. Just like how heteros shouldn't engage in sex acts outside of procreation. Essentially when you experience physical pleasures too often, you begin to seek them all the time. When you don't get it, you become emotionally distressed. And that emotional distress prevents reaching enlightenment.

The Dalai Lama should have responded like Thich Nhat Hanh:

God is a Lesbian

Because I have been practicing as a Buddhist, I know that between the creator and the created there must be some kind of link, otherwise creation would not be possible. So the chrysanthemum can say that God is a flower, and I agree, because there must be the element “flower” in God so that the flower could become a reality. So the flower has the right to say that God is a flower.

The white person has the right to say that God is white, and the black person also has the right to say that God is black. In fact, if you go to Africa, you’ll see that the Virgin Mary is black. If you don’t make the statue of the Virgin Mary black, it does not inspire people. Because to us the black people, “black is beautiful,” so a black person has the right to say that God is black, and in fact I also believe that God is black, but God is not only black, God is also white, God is also a flower.

So when a lesbian thinks of her relationship with God, if she practices deeply, she can find out that God is also a lesbian. Otherwise how could you be there? God is a lesbian, that is what I think, and God is gay also. God is no less. God is a lesbian, but also a gay, a black a white, a chrysanthemum. It is because you don’t understand that, that you discriminate.

"When you discriminate against the black or the white, or the flower, or the lesbian, you discriminate against God, which is the basic goodness in you. You create suffering all around you, and you create suffering within yourself, and it is delusion, ignorance, that is the basis of your action, your attitude of discrimination.
 
The Dalai Lama should have responded like Thich Nhat Hanh:

God is a Lesbian

Because I have been practicing as a Buddhist, I know that between the creator and the created there must be some kind of link, otherwise creation would not be possible. So the chrysanthemum can say that God is a flower, and I agree, because there must be the element “flower” in God so that the flower could become a reality. So the flower has the right to say that God is a flower.

The white person has the right to say that God is white, and the black person also has the right to say that God is black. In fact, if you go to Africa, you’ll see that the Virgin Mary is black. If you don’t make the statue of the Virgin Mary black, it does not inspire people. Because to us the black people, “black is beautiful,” so a black person has the right to say that God is black, and in fact I also believe that God is black, but God is not only black, God is also white, God is also a flower.

So when a lesbian thinks of her relationship with God, if she practices deeply, she can find out that God is also a lesbian. Otherwise how could you be there? God is a lesbian, that is what I think, and God is gay also. God is no less. God is a lesbian, but also a gay, a black a white, a chrysanthemum. It is because you don’t understand that, that you discriminate.

"When you discriminate against the black or the white, or the flower, or the lesbian, you discriminate against God, which is the basic goodness in you. You create suffering all around you, and you create suffering within yourself, and it is delusion, ignorance, that is the basis of your action, your attitude of discrimination.


I'm not a Buddhist, but studied it a lot about 15 years or so ago. And the historical Buddha's teachings were pretty much compatible still with other religions, to some extents. I have a couple of Thích Nhất Hạnh books and this one in particular really helped me with overcoming severe anger and rage issues I had (along with working with a clinical anger therapist if course).

95734.jpg

I did get confused and found studying Buddhism tiresome once I got into the differences between Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana, etc.

But the books I have of the historical buddha's speeches and sermons has some good stuff.

In particular I used to read these pocket books daily

51JqUoZLW4L._SX334_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


711t9a1dnPL._AC_UL320_SR216,320_.jpg
 
I'm not a Buddhist, but studied it a lot about 15 years or so ago. And the historical Buddha's teachings were pretty much compatible still with other religions, to some extents. I have a couple of Thích Nhất Hạnh books and this one in particular really helped me with overcoming severe anger and rage issues I had (along with working with a clinical anger therapist if course).

95734.jpg

I did get confused and found studying Buddhism tiresome once I got into the differences between Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana, etc.

But the books I have of the historical buddha's speeches and sermons has some good stuff.

In particular I used to read these pocket books daily

51JqUoZLW4L._SX334_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


711t9a1dnPL._AC_UL320_SR216,320_.jpg

I have just started getting into Buddhism. Stephen Batchelor's book Buddhism Without Beliefs: A Contemporary Guide to Awawkening is what sparked my interest. He has another really good book that came out recently title Secular Buddhism: Imagining the Dharma in an Uncertain World. Batchelor focuses more on the psychological aspects of Buddhism by focusing mainly on the earliest texts from the Pali Canon. Of course, I have numerous books from Thich Nhat Hanh. He is someone I greatly admire and has inspired me to stop being such a jerk. Studying Buddhism has really forced me to examine my thoughts and the bad habits I have allowed my mind to continually reinforce.
 
What he is saying though is in line with core Buddhist principles. Buddhism, at its core, is centered around a "middle path" in everything. Along with attempting to live in a way that both causes the least harm to others, and prevents the suffering of others as much as is reasonable.

Some asylum seekers staying and being welcomed in by their host countries, while others go back to rebuild their home land and help their fellow country men is pretty much in line with that thought.
It also claims that everything is as it should be, and to be non-judgemental about everything.
 
#MeTooGuru

Dalai Lama admits he knew about Buddhist teachers' sexual abuse

The Tibetan spiritual leader told Dutch TV he has known about the historic sex crimes in Europe since the 1990s. He was presented with written accounts from 12 alleged victims from Belgium and the Netherlands.


The Dalai Lama, during a four-day visit to the Netherlands, has confirmed he was informed about historic sexual abuse by Buddhist teachers against their followers in Europe.

"I already did know these things, [it's] nothing new," the Dalai Lama said in response to a question on Dutch public television NOS late on Saturday.

"Twenty-five years ago... someone mentioned about a problem of sexual allegations" at a conference for western Buddhist teachers in Dharamshala, a hill town in northern India, he added.

A group using the hashtag "metooguru" gathered some 1,300 signatures so he could receive their collection of testimonies.

"We found refuge in Buddhism with an open mind and heart, until we were raped in its name," the alleged victims said in their petition.

The Dalai Lama "has consistently denounced such irresponsible and unethical behavior," according to one of his representatives in Europe, on Friday.
 
Back
Top