- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Messages
- 33,424
- Reaction score
- 5,685
Thats not true -- you have a Free trade deal without movement with Canada. Canada imports 62 billion from the entire EU. The UK imports 105 billion from Germany alone. So, your small market comparison falls short.
You literally have free free trade with Canada - so i have no idea what this more expensive for outside states rhetoric stems from.
Canada - a country that does a a fraction of the trade the UK does, not a member state and it gets free trade. Why cant the same rules apply to the UK without certain regulation? Japan cant get free trade if they open shop in the UK.
You are going to have businesses in your most important states clamouring for no tariffs with the UK
Im not talking about a political union, im talking about an economic free trade deal -- one you already have in place with a non member -- one that really benefits everyone. Germany is going to be ok with losing out on a portion of 106 billion a year? France?
Then why do you have free trade with Canada? Why not extend the same framework to the UK? Its not like its a new concept.
Sure, the U.K can use the Canadian free trade model, if they're willing to kill off their lucrative financial services sector.
Free Trade is not a problem, and there are quite a few existing frameworks to choose from. The problem is NONE of them include the total access to the EU Single Market offered to their rules-abiding members.
We actually have throughly discussed the pros and cons of the four viable Free Trade models back in v1, well before the Brexit vote. I highly recommend you (and everyone else who are new to this topic) to take a look:
What will happen to Britain if there's Brexit? Here are four possible outcomes
June 17, 2016
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/b...er-the-outcome.3176729/page-18#post-117848715
Last edited: