- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 33,051
- Reaction score
- 23,522
The end of western civilization as we know it
Wow another thread with some cry baby complaining about "teh liberal media".
Or why GoT mangina directors wanted to made up a fist fight where Brienne fuck up the Hound
I see your point but to be fair, we used to watch scenes where Bruce Lee or Jackie Chan beat up like a hundred guys in a row. Movies don't really give an accurate depiction of fighting.Yeah, but Brienne is beast of a woman, and it was a sword fight with heavy armor. It's not like The Hound absolutely dwarfed her in size and strength.
I don't have nearly as much of a problem with that, than I do when I see a 120lb chick kick the shit out of a 300lb dude in hand to hand combat that you see regularly in a movie or TV Show. "Preacher" just had one of those scenes. In one moment, huge dude is controlling this mouse of a woman with one hand, the next, she is going all ninja on him and beats him to death. That shit is ridiculous.
I see your point but to be fair, we used to watch scenes where Bruce Lee or Jackie Chan beat up like a hundred guys in a row. Movies don't really give an accurate depiction of fighting.
In all honesty, it doesn't actually bother me. It's all fantasy, and it just depends on how well you set up the situation and characters.
If you're gonna go there though, there are so many more scenes to nitpick than the Brienne/Hound fight scene from GOT. That was actually really well done.
Yes, the show is geared towards people who have higher brain functions and have more ways to solve problems then "shoot it".
Yep. Just like all the whining about lack of women lead movie characters. They just need to get their shit together and create something fun and watchable instead of whining and piggybacking onto men.idrc at the end of the day but i do find it weird how they have to try and fuck with tradition instead of just creating new female leads in new shows
I don't care when fictional characters are reimagined. It is art, and art gets modified, re-imagined, reinterpreted etc..
They can re-imagine Sherlock Holmes as a woman but to me Jeremy Brett will always be the standard.
They can re-imagine Jeeves and Wooster as females but to me Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry can't be topped.
This is where I'd draw the fucking line.They can re-imagine Jeeves and Wooster as females but to me Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry can't be topped.
"There is a reason that movies put in place a Joe every man character in every movie even when one does not make sense"
This would make sense if the doctor was ever a "joe-everyman character." (Incidentally, the title of the show is "Doctor Who" but the name/title of The Doctor is simply "The Doctor", not "Doctor Who". If you're going to get outraged about something in a show, it should be a show you've watched.) It would also make sense if this wasn't meant to portray an alien that canonically shifted between entirely different bodies and personalities every few years (seasons), with gender-swapping a canonically established possibility. It would also be possibly relevant if TS watched the show. I've seen maybe half a dozen episodes with an ex-girlfriend, and I know better than that.