- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 14,603
- Reaction score
- 2,675
Regardless, that's what they are. Can't be feeling too sorry for that.
Do you also extend that to every other predator?
Regardless, that's what they are. Can't be feeling too sorry for that.
Do you also extend that to every other predator?
No. But not every other predator would kill me on sight if they saw me.
Maybe more people will care because there's a dog and a pelican in the pictures.
@faustian is a good guy, he just gets caught up in the bad crowd sometimes.My opinion of you literally dropped with that post.
Maybe more people will care because there's a dog and a pelican in the pictures.
@Zookeeper Gabe is just a fascist who apparently doesn't believe sharks deserve a fair trial. Not my problem@faustian is a good guy, he just gets caught up in the bad crowd sometimes.
I can't believe people are justifying this because sharks are "killing machines"
And dogs eat catsPelicans eat fish just like sharks so probably not
Sharks don't need a trial and judging by the comments here they wouldn't get a fair one. Way to many people seem to think they are mindless killing machines that eat every person they see.@Zookeeper Gabe is just a fascist who apparently doesn't believe sharks deserve a fair trial. Not my problem
lol wooooosssshhhhhhhSharks don't need a trial and judging by the comments here they wouldn't get a fair one. Way to many people seem to think they are mindless killing machines that eat every person they see.
Jesus. Sharks are not murderers, they are predators.
Sharks don't need a trial and judging by the comments here they wouldn't get a fair one. Way to many people seem to think they are mindless killing machines that eat every person they see.
Idk, you tell me. Are you still waiting for the results of an investigation? Maybe they were trying to free the shark but they somehow couldn't cut the rope going that fast?Umm... OK. Now what?
Idk, you tell me. Are you still waiting for the results of an investigation? Maybe they were trying to free the shark but they somehow couldn't cut the rope going that fast?
I'm done with you after this post : they showed a picture of the aftermath. How does that change anything I've previously stated? Even if the shark did get caught (which I'm not sure of either way) wouldn't there be a carcass just like in the picture? What does this picture PROVE?
Just stop... I don't condone the torturing of animals, but I also don't condone pitchforking before the facts are in. You don't have them but you've been beating this drum all day. Just give it a rest.
If he killed it I'm pretty sure they are protected. I've had them fly into my mono and had them take my bait but always freed them was always told not to kill them. I even had one fly down in the lazarette hatch that came pretty close to taking out my one of my eyes just threw the fucker up on deck and it flew away. I don't understand the need to take a photo of it like that or worse yet kill it if he did.my post or that guy holding the pelican?
he's got a bunch of pics with him holding birds and shit
I did reply properly and I'm pretty sure you're trollin at this point. I made a very clear distinction between murder and a predatory animal behaving how it should.
As for the rest of those pictures Florida Fish and Wildlife better charge the fuck out of him.
*Sigh*
This is what I asked: From the perspective of evoking human sympathy, what's the difference?
Do you understand what human sympathy is? Layman's terms its called feeling sorry.
Now why would someone feel less sorry for a creature getting killed by a predator, vs getting killed by a human for no reason? Both ways are gruesome, painful, and the creature ends up dead.
I mean if I got mauled to death by a bear and eaten, I'd hope my family would feel equally as bad as me getting murdered by some random dude.