- Joined
- Jan 31, 2017
- Messages
- 1,260
- Reaction score
- 0
Ummm, nobody ever hits Floyd, and Pea got hit all the time. Even beaten. He was just flashier. Floyd is more solid and effective defensively.Interesting. How so?
Ummm, nobody ever hits Floyd, and Pea got hit all the time. Even beaten. He was just flashier. Floyd is more solid and effective defensively.Interesting. How so?
Ummm, nobody ever hits Floyd, and Pea got hit all the time. Even beaten. He was just flashier. Floyd is more solid and effective defensively.
Canelos career elevates floyds career
Does he get hit more than Pea? We're comparing here, and Floyd wins IMO. Nobody outboxed Floyd. Nobody even beat the guy. I don't see how this is debatable.What do you mean nobody hits floyd? Where did this come from ?? Floyd is hittable heck he's been rocked multiple times, his adaptability Is just from another planet.
Floyd got hit from time to time. Mosley cracked him. Corley rocked him. Zab got a few in. The thing with Floyd though is getting that second shot in to end him was near impossible. His defensive instincts and ring IQ are unsurpassed. I believe he had one of the greatest ring IQs in the history of the sport. Just my opinion, obviously, as something like that is not really measurable.What do you mean nobody hits floyd? Where did this come from ?? Floyd is hittable heck he's been rocked multiple times, his adaptability Is just from another planet.
The problem with Whitakers defense vs Floyds was that Whitaker's came off as showboating and judges don't like that. Its part of the reason he was in closer fights than he should have been.Does he get hit more than Pea? We're comparing here, and Floyd wins IMO. Nobody outboxed Floyd. Nobody even beat the guy. I don't see how this is debatable.
Floyd got hit from time to time. Mosley cracked him. Corley rocked him. Zab got a few in. The thing with Floyd though is getting that second shot in to end him was near impossible. His defensive instincts and ring IQ are unsurpassed. I believe he had one of the greatest ring IQs in the history of the sport. Just my opinion, obviously, as something like that is not really measurable.
Does he get hit more than Pea? We're comparing here, and Floyd wins IMO. Nobody outboxed Floyd. Nobody even beat the guy. I don't see how this is debatable.
Keep failing.Eh Castillo hit him a lot and arguably outboxed him while in his absolute prime
I think thats tough to support. He's top 5, pretty easy at that.
eh, he accomplished more than most of the guys on that list.
See Leonard is an example of name notoriety outweighing actual accomplishment. Yeah, yeah. Hearns. Duran. Hagler. Oh my. Great wins. But how about the fact he lost to Duran? how about the fact that Floyd was the best P4P in the world at a point in his career when Leonard was a stepping stone in his?
Ezzard Charles? Charles did more than Floyd? Come on now.
I don't like fighters like Gans and Langford being part of modern all time lists. The sport was pretty much pro wrestling back then. Ever notice how often those guys fought opponents 3 times, splitting the first two? If you see that on a fighter's record from that era, its a red flag.
Floyd has topped the P4P ranks for over a decade in the sport. Conor was like 1 of 3 or 4 guys he's fought in like 20 years that wasn't a former world champion and the first guy who wasn't ranked in the top 10 since he fought Hernandez.
Everyone you mentioned lost to someone he shouldn't have too. Why doesn't that matter when you're looking at the all time picture?
The problem with Whitakers defense vs Floyds was that Whitaker's came off as showboating and judges don't like that. Its part of the reason he was in closer fights than he should have been.
I just think you have to give Floyd the edge as the better defensive fighter as he never lost, never got dropped from a punch and had one of the lowest ratio of punches received to punches landed in punch tracking history.
Crazy how the nearest Floyd got to getting knocked down was him getting hit and losing his balance a little. You can call it a knockdown but floyd was never in any danger and it was more of a balance thing than anything.Zab made Floyd support himself on the floor. That's a knockdown.\
Can't agree with Louis, Charles and Pep rating over Floyd. Greb either, really.SRR, Greb, Joe Louis, Ezzard Charles, Joe Gans, Benny Leonard, Henry Armstrong, Willie Pep, SRL, and Duran IMO are all better P4P than Floyd and it was pretty easy to name them off the top of my head.
Keep failing.
Can't agree with Louis, Charles and Pep rating over Floyd. Greb either, really.
there really should be a separate ranking for fighters from eras where boxing was controlled by the mob, too.
Floyd made a career of making people dislike him. There are people who vote that Pac beat him too.You do realize that even though Floyd is an ATG he wasn't even voted the best fighter of any decade during his career by the Boxing Writers Association of America? He still could be for the 2010's (2010-2019) but I wouldn't necessarily bet on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar_Ray_Robinson_Award
Crazy how the nearest Floyd got to getting knocked down was him getting hit and losing his balance a little. You can call it a knockdown but floyd was never in any danger and it was more of a balance thing than anything.