Of course he didn't want the Soviet Union invaded. But he never believed Hitler was going to invade in the first place. That's why the Red Army was caught with it's pants down in the early stages of Barbarossa. The pact with Hitler was purely a power grab, nothing more. If Hitler had kept his word, Stalin would have been happy to split Europe between the USSR and the Nazis, and he wouldn't have given a fuck what happened to the Jews or fellow Slavs like the Poles. He eventually would have gone to war with Nazi Germany, but only when he was sure he could win. Barbarossa forced his hand, and he had to join forces with the Allies.
Arguing that Stalin is somehow less evil than Hitler is like saying a Mexican Cartel sicaro is less evil than a serial killer because the former murders purely for money rather than pleasure![]()
Leon Trotsky — 'You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.'
Che Guevara was also a rapist:
Islam is a declaration of the freedom of man from servitude to other men. Thus it strives from the beginning to abolish all those systems and governments which are based on the rule of man over men and the servitude of one human being to another.
Sayid qutb
I don't see Stalin quite as bad as Hitler. Hitler was a fanatic whose approach would have resulted in gays, colored people, and the disabled being killed wholesale. Stalin held some dangerous, absurd beliefs that fucked the Soviet Union up, like Lysenkoism, but I don't see him as being quite as extreme as Hitler.
once you get past your first million, the numbers stop mattering. True, Hitler's intent was more insidious than Stalin's. That said, Nazism was like a quick destructive hurricane. Communism has been like an Ice Age. It is always the more "beneficent" dystopias that present the greatest evil.
I don't see Stalin quite as bad as Hitler. Hitler was a fanatic whose approach would have resulted in gays, colored people, and the disabled being killed wholesale. Stalin held some dangerous, absurd beliefs that fucked the Soviet Union up, like Lysenkoism, but I don't see him as being quite as extreme as Hitler.
But it's so hip and edgy to be a fan and wear one of his teeshirts.
I could only watch the first video, that guy was a fucking parrot and it was disgusting how uninformed he was. The USSR guy didn't have an answer for long Capitalism took because it took place naturally and occurred throughout societies for thousands of years. He thinks just because some goon like Marx who doesn't want religion but uses the Matthew Effect (taken literally from the bible) and he says it's strictly used in Capitalist economies when in reality it's used in every economic system.
I can see why socialism is appealing to the uneducated. They don't know what the fuck Marx is talking about and they don't have critical thinking skills to properly critique it.
Some of this stuff isn't arranging chairs on a sinking ship but one that's already on the bottom of the ocean. The interesting thing is that some "educated" people are telling everyone that their not smart enough to understand Marxism so in their mind they win every argument based on that alone.
Their methods are easily recognized and they fancy themselves sophisticated and above the fray. It's totally delusional and grandiose.
The joke amongst the fishing fleet when the wall came down was that the only communist left were college professors. Scoring high on paper unfortunately was the extent of it for some of them. Interesting that my favorite teacher leaned pretty far left but I grew up in the hard knock world of commercial fishing and saw how things actually worked so realized that you couldn't take any one perspective and run with it.
Would have did more college but fishing opportunities presented themselves in a unique way and it was time to go all in. Even my mom who pushed for education said you can study the rest of your life and you better go for it when you have a opportunity. She knew what real life is about.
One of the challenging things about college was putting up with a bunch of people that thought they knew about something that they knew nothing about. They wanted to make national parks in Alaska the size of California but wouldn't listen to someone who lived there , it's the nature of the "intelligencia" as Sowell would say.
I know there is a greater point to your story but I am jealous as fuck you got to fish on the seas. Mad respect.
I post some quotes from an economist because economy and politics are intertwined.
Hazlitt was a journalist with no education in economics, and he was more into Austrianism than real economics. Calling him an economist is like calling Jeane Dixon an astronomer.
He is not trained as an economist but that is not necessary. I call him an economist because he wrote the best economic book ever. His economic book "Economics in One Lesson" sold millions of copies.
Lol, there's a reason why Business and Economics are taught in different buildings at most Universities.He is not trained as an economist but that is not necessary. I call him an economist because he wrote the best economic book ever. His economic book "Economics in One Lesson" sold millions of copies.
![]()
"It is a brilliant performance. It says precisely the things which need most saying and says them with a rare courage and integrity. I know of no other modern book from which the intelligent layman can learn so much about the basics truths of economics in so short a time" - F.A Hayek, 1974 Nobel Laureate in Economic Science.
“Henry Hazlitt’s explanation of how a price system works is a true classic: timeless, correct, painlessly instructive.” — Milton Friedman