- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 9,240
- Reaction score
- 518
Just don't have sex with college girls while you're in college.
That's what townies are for, anyway.
That's what townies are for, anyway.
If the guy was aware of the standard, he'd look for more of a response. In the situation he describes, it was her lack of a response that encouraged him. He obviously wasn't trying to assault her and wouldn't have done it if he'd had a better understanding going in. Communicating a different standard wouldn't stop an actual predator (who would also be expected to lie if called on it), but it would stop a guy like that. And I think guys like that probably make up a significant portion (though a minority) of sexual assaulters. On the other side, the woman who is "victimized" by that kind of thing isn't left wondering if it's her mistake or something if the standard is clear.
In that situation, I'd think it would be sufficient for her to undo her own buttons or something or rub or guide his hand while he's fingering her or whatever to communicate affirmative consent.
If false rape accusations where never a problem with you, then keep living your life. This whole issue should never affect you.
Yet this was my original point, why the fuck did this bill strike a chord with you playas?
And also I am still not impressed. Try harder son.
If false rape accusations where never a problem with you, then keep living your life. This whole issue should never affect you.
Yet this was my original point, why the fuck did this bill strike a chord with you playas?
And also I am still not impressed. Try harder son.
Just don't have sex with college girls while you're in college.
That's what high school girls are for, anyway.
you said it.
yuppers
I would have thought by now that all college students would have the 'Good to Go'
sexual consent phone app.
http://good2goapp.com/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/consensual-sex-app-good2go_n_5903036.html
I use it with my wife......and all my mistresses.:icon_chee
You are still being full of shit I see. I remember you defending yourself a while back saying you were not a SJW. BUT on almost every issue you side with them.
Then you come into this thread and play dumb and act like the leftist aren't controlling the schools and the idiotic ideas that they come up with.
Once a hack always a hack.
And consent can be revoked at any time.
So in the middle of intercourse, a woman can change her mind (or claimed she changed her mind), not give you any verbal or non-verbal cues that she changed her mind, and you are now a rapist. Furthermore, it just increases ambiguity from the court's perspective since more often than not, initiating sexual contact, whether it's first, second, third base or a home run tends to be non-verbal in nature.
Basically anything other than a "can I finger you" responded with a "yes, you may finger me" (who the fuck acts like this during sex?), will be viewed as sexual assault in the court's eye. And even that might not stand as affirmative consent because the girl can change her mind one second later without telling you and you have now sexually assaulted her.
This law is basically a false accuser's godsend.
It makes false rape accusations easier. That is really the only thing I can think of.