This has gotten amazingly little press. In the hellhole that is Yemen, the Shiite militants have just successfully taken over the capital city, Sanaa (one of the oldest centers of Islam), and the Yemen president (a staunch ally of the US) has been captured by the militants. The US is sending warships to the area.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/21/us-sends-navy-warships-into-red-sea-poised-for-emb/
People focus on Islamic State, but the reality is that Yemen is completely out of control, and now basically replicates the debacle to the North, being controlled by Shiite rebels, Al Qaeda Sunnis, and a brutal regime supported by the West and Saudi Arabia that is collapsing (well, pretty much collapsed yesterday) under the extremist assault.
So much is coming back to haunt Saudi Arabia ... they are surrounded by nightmare extremists to the North AND the South now. The US cannot solve this problem for them. Either the Saudis step up to the plate, or they are going to get systematically dismantled by the extremists within and without their country.
The Saudis are so wealthy and corrupt that they can't possibly stomach the sort of nasty, sustained, Chechnya style intervention that would be required to impose order on Yemen. And the US won't do it for them.
I don't see any solution, I'm just glad the Shiites appear to be coming out on top here, since Al Qaeda in Yemen is possibly the worst of all Al Qaeda branches.
Another interesting thing about the 'false prophets' and their followings. How did Mohammed establish the 'true Islam' against them?
He either killed them or they were forced to convert after he defeated them in battle. Mohammed himself had the Yemeni prophet Aswad al Ansi assassinated, and his first caliph killed Musaylimah in battle. Tulayha converted after his total defeat by the Muslim military, Sajah converted after her husband Musaylimah was killed. This is how the Arabian peninsula was unified under "Islam" by Mohammed and Abu Bakr, in the traditional account (probably all mythological, but still interesting).
Christians have done the same. Heck everyone in power back then religiously or not, came into power by killing someone.
No, Christianity spread mainly through conversions.
Or do you think some jewish refugees established christianism in Rome through conquest?
Who is supporting these Shiite militants? Is it the Iranians badass Quds force? Well at least they are winning something. Is this ousted Prez a Sunni or a Shiite? I did not know there were fundamentalist and extreme Shiites.
How come there are some countries like Jordan or Oman, Algeria, Morocco that have avoided this insurgent problem?
Christians have done the same. Heck everyone in power back then religiously or not, came into power by killing someone.
This has gotten amazingly little press. In the hellhole that is Yemen, the Shiite militants have just successfully taken over the capital city, Sanaa (one of the oldest centers of Islam), and the Yemen president (a staunch ally of the US) has been captured by the militants. The US is sending warships to the area.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/21/us-sends-navy-warships-into-red-sea-poised-for-emb/
People focus on Islamic State, but the reality is that Yemen is completely out of control, and now basically replicates the debacle to the North, being controlled by Shiite rebels, Al Qaeda Sunnis, and a brutal regime supported by the West and Saudi Arabia that is collapsing (well, pretty much collapsed yesterday) under the extremist assault.
So much is coming back to haunt Saudi Arabia ... they are surrounded by nightmare extremists to the North AND the South now. The US cannot solve this problem for them. Either the Saudis step up to the plate, or they are going to get systematically dismantled by the extremists within and without their country.
Every country in the region is corrupt and despotic. I have no sympathy for any of them, let em all burn. Reaping what they sowed. The onky way to govern in those countries is authoritarianism.
This story is so hush hush because the US is behind it. The fact that there was no reaction from them; no embassy evacuation, no condemnation, no intervention, is because this was orchestrated by the US and Iran behind the scenes. The US is secretly helping the Shia's gain control over the ME. The Houthis in Yemen, Assad in Syria (even though people will refute this due to America's support of the rebels. Truthfully the support is in shambles and is purely symbolic; if they really wanted Assad gone, he would've been gone) Shias in Iraq with full cooperation with Iran.
The US sees Al Saud lately as fragile and corrupt. Their control over Saudi Arabia and their influence in the ME is waning. They have become a liability; especially with an ailing King Abdullah and possbily even dead but the Saudi's are keeping it quite as to not stir dissension within Al Saud. The US sees an Iranian controlled and influenced ME is far more predictable and stable, than Sunni extremists control over the region. Which is most likely the only other option due to the current instability and the rise of ISIS. Israel sees Assad and Shias in general as good neighbours and far less of a threat than the alternative. The current ongoing geopolitical shifts are to protect Israel and to keep Sunni extremism in check. And the answer is to support the Shiites.
What inspired the signature?