That's actually more like something I would post, although my writing style is less like a high school English paper written by Michael Scott ("
scrupled in analogy"? Wtf does that mean? To hesitate on moral grounds...in...a comparison between two things?). Personally, I must "lack the comprehension to properly interpret" what "
the nature of the conduct here, not his upbringing, is the matter being scrupled in analogy" could possibly mean to a literate adult.
For Mick, he's happy to flame and shit post less discretely. One that comes to mind is when luckyshot made a long and sincerely thought-out post about free speech:
And Mick responded with:
The point being that
@MadDildo, unlike more capable moderators, doesn't try to adhere to the rules that he then arbitrarily enforces in lieu of argument. Just as with any other vindictive partisan , he's perfectly comfortable with shameless hypocrisy. But when it annoys me (it unfortunately and obviously does at times), I just think of the sadness of weaponizing internet moderator power because a stranger made you feel dumb.