- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 28,964
- Reaction score
- 15,423
**This post is not an acknowledgement of you being anything more than a trash poster**
I have been called many things. I have been called racist by neo nazi fuckups, I have been called aby disingenuous white nationalists, but one thing I have NEVER been called is a sexist. Not once. You have the honor of being the first, so i'm going to play nice (through gritted teeth) and ask on what grounds you consider me sexist?
Do note that if you choose to respond, i'm going to spit fire at you because I genuinely take offense to that characterization. There will be
quotes involved. I'll stay on topic though because i'm genuinely curious.@ehtheist, nothing? I saw you in the thread after I posted, why so quiet now that i've found myself calling out your slanderous accusations?
I'm starting to think you only like talking to me when i'm slapping you around, which actually kind of explains a lot.
Oh sweetie, you have no idea how happy it made me to see that you actually bitGive a girl some time though - you can't post "I DEMAND QUOTES!" during a work day and then act like someone is dodging you when they don't get back to you in a span of roughly three hours. I'll be getting to you when I have time to find the relevant threads.
I will leave something I need from you before I proceed though. Frankly, I can see how someone who constantly has their finger pointed with the word "RACISM!" coming from their mouth would be aghast that someone would pin one of the big social bogeymen terms on them. (seriously everyone, run a search for this guy looking for the word "racism" - there are literally dozens upon dozens of instances of him pointing the finger at pretty much everyone under the sun). So, what I need from you is an answer to this line of querying. In an incidence of sexism, racism, ableism, etc etc, is it the sexist/racist/ableist/whatever who gets to decide what's racist, or is it the person who is the target of the sexist/racist/ableist in question? Basically, if a white guy uses a term directed at you, is it him or you who decides if it's racist? Clear that up before we begin and I'll get you your quotes. I mean, if I can get over my jitters about you "spitting fire" at me![]()
That answer would poison the well of your raw feelings on me. I'm not looking for "How ehtheist feels after Falsedawn has cleared up some of her internal tensions about him", i'm looking for why you think i'm sexist. I'll give you the open book treatment after you tell me what it is that actually makes me sexist, and the simple fact that I responded to you with more that "obsession noted" should be good faith that i'm not bullshitting here. The gimmick is by the wayside for the moment, don't push farther than you have to and fuck up a good thing.
Well your boy Fawlty said that people in Syria have no choice but to rape little boys and stone women to death, so...So now all of a sudden you are concerned about innocent people and little kids getting raped and pillaged, and your solution is to destroy them. Nice.
Frankly, I don't give two shits about "good faith" or what you think about my feelings. You're the sexist and before I get into a discussion about why you're a sexist, I insist that you close a few loopholes by which you might try and weasel out of being dubbed a misogynist.
So, answer or don't. I'm not going to waste my time unless you do. So again:
"So, what I need from you is an answer to this line of querying. In an incidence of sexism, racism, ableism, etc etc, is it the sexist/racist/ableist/whatever who gets to decide what's racist, or is it the person who is the target of the sexist/racist/ableist in question? Basically, if a white guy uses a term directed at you, is it him or you who decides if it's racist? Clear that up before we begin and I'll get you your quotes."
Get to it or waste someone else's time with threats of "spitting fire" at them or whatever the hell it is you think makes you sound imposing.
If you can't believe that i'm going to address everything you post directly, then there's really no point to us having this conversation. In previous instances when you've accused me of bullshitting, i've gone point for point with you, so why would this be any different? Believe me, I have no intentions of wasting your time, if I wanted to do that I would have just giffed you into bolivian, but instead this time I decided i'd reach out and see if we can get to the bottom of your irrational hatred for me.
But hey, if you think that's a little too much, I can go back to the gimmick. Shame on me for trying to address you with some modicum of earnestness.
The change in demeanor was cute though, so aside from the anger and slander, you have that going for you I guess.
Well your boy Fawlty said that people in Syria have no choice but to rape little boys and stone women to death, so...
*watches Falsedawn write far more in explaining why he isn't answering the question than it would have taken him to answer the question*
This is what avoiding a question looks likeTo be fair, I'm impressed. I wouldn't have pegged you for being smart enough to figure out how badly answering it would fuck you whichever way you went. Avoiding it is really your only safe course here.
And "point for point" with me? Really? You want to know what you going "point for point" with me looks like? It looks like this:
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/who-would-you-rather-your-country-be-associated-with-lena-dunham-or-vladimir-putin.3422569/page-3
And you look like a fucking fool who posts idiotic memes, crass sexual references, and whose position eventually devolves into insisting that he isn't reading the points you're supposedly going "point for point with" before you run from the thread like a little bitch.
He was running for War Room President. Some links to a beastiality site with some incriminating evidence were released by Hans Leaks. It was gross.
Good poster, very questionable human being.![]()
Nice to know I can fly under the radar . . .
Some of y'all are hopeless . . . and the rest will learn. I'm sure there aren't too many I wouldn't hang out with . . . at least for a little bit.
Discussing things from different angles is how we learn . . . right?
I think he has to give the quote to the entire forum at this point. No offence, but if you're going to constantly accuse a guy of being a troll and purport to have evidence... What's the point of being discrete at this point?
You couldn't have possibly come across worse in this thread. This is absolutely pathetic.*watches Falsedawn write far more in explaining why he isn't answering the question than it would have taken him to answer the question*
This is what avoiding a question looks likeTo be fair, I'm impressed. I wouldn't have pegged you for being smart enough to figure out how badly answering it would fuck you whichever way you went. Avoiding it is really your only safe course here.
And "point for point" with me? Really? You want to know what you going "point for point" with me looks like? It looks like this:
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/who-would-you-rather-your-country-be-associated-with-lena-dunham-or-vladimir-putin.3422569/page-3
And you look like a fucking fool who posts idiotic memes, crass sexual references, and whose position eventually devolves into insisting that he isn't reading the points you're supposedly going "point for point with" before you run from the thread like a little bitch.
Yeah this one's getting bookmarked for end-of-year too. May has been a motherfucker.If we're being totally honest, that thread was after this one, where I found your arguments so vapid and incongruent that I wrote you off entirely. I had previously thought of you as a well spoken crazy person, but after you came at me with the absolute worst and disingenuous defense of outright racism, I was pretty much done with you.
But hey, if you don't want to have this discussion, I guess i'm fine with that. For someone who accuses me of wasting time, you sure wasted a lot of time here. For someone who accused me of "not reading the points and running from the thread", this sure looks a lot like you not reading the points and finding an excuse to leave the thread. For someone who accuses me of avoiding the question, you sure are avoiding the question. Projection? Or did you just figure out when you searched my history how I outright defend abortion rights or that my criticisms toward women all stem from a legitimate reason (however valid) as opposed to irrational hatred? Did you figure out my love for joshi puroresu and how I outright idolize many female pro wrestlers for their skill? Did you figure out that I (to this day) still consider Hillary Clinton one of the most qualified presidential candidates we've ever had? Or how I extol the virtuosity of First Wave Feminists? Sounds like your sexist argument falls apart when you start moving into the realm of having to provide proof.
But hey, that's you, or at least the you I expected. Trash as usual. There will never be a day in your life where you are not beneath me, and I don't need to invoke my manhood to see that.
And right over your head that went.Is this some kind of passive aggressive way of not disagreeing with posters on your side of the fence?
Damn! @ehtheist and @Falsedawn... This thread was supposed to be about respect.
This is why we can't have nice things.