Social WR Lounge v250: The Discord strikes back

Which superpower would you choose?


  • Total voters
    52
Status
Not open for further replies.
ovWfQpK.gif



I will usually post reactions to certain threads because a lot of the main ones in here have lots of racism and misogyny throughout and I just don't want to exchange ideas in that sort of thread. I don't know why it is upsetting? This place is a little more civilized.
<DontBelieve1>
 
@Social Distance Warrior In re Mick's "hordes of uneducated migrants who don't share our cultural values"



Mostly the "not the same cultural values" part.

It's hysterical that Mick and @HereticBD would still stick behind the "cultural values" argument after American conservatives spent years knowingly spreading lies and pretending to believe laughable claims, cheering on discrimination on the basis of religion, trying to overturn a democratic election, and applauding known efforts to disenfranchise racial minorities on objectively baseless grounds.

I mean, what values do American conservatives hold that they don't? Belief in democracy? LOL, nope. Belief in secularism? LOL, nope. Belief in multiculturalism? LOL, nope. Support for science? LOL, nope. Support of rights for homosexuals? LOL, nope.

The American right is ideologically and ethically indistinguishable from - or, better yet, definitively less politically defensible than - conservatives in Arab and African countries. The thing is.....those foreign conservatives have an excuse on the basis of largely not having access to great education and not having instantaneous access to all the information in the world through high-speed internet.

I would rather someone just grow some balls [insert joke about liberals believing genitals don't matter, etc.] and say they believe/know nonwhites are genetically inferior or incapable of rational thought.
The cultural values line has always rang hollow but after four years of carrying water for an adulterous sex abusing racist it's just stunning. I saw a tweet from white nationalist Nick Fuentes that criticized Tucker for being too coded with his language, instead of just outright advocating for a white ethnostate. He said this is why conservatism could die out. It made me wonder if that sort of coding will go away or if it is effective.
 
That thread is about a police shooting in Minneapolis. And one that I know very little about and that, to my knowledge, has nothing to do with immigrants.

Funny how that didn't stop you from engaging in that thread, before a bunch of people started making fun of you...

You ran here for friendlier confines, because you're a fragile little girl looking for support. Shut out "The Conners" from your parents' bedroom and grow a sack, ya twat.
 
It's a minefield, man. I was at a bar the other day, and without thinking, I greeted the bartender with my usual, "hey, my fellow bepenised-at-birth-American, how's it (i.e., that natural penis of yours) hanging?" And he was like, "Jack, I'm a FTM trans person. And also, I'm here on a work visa. You didn't know?" I was like, "shit, no, I'm so sorry. I wasn't thinking." Learned a lesson about making assumptions that day! But he was cool about it. And yes, I say "i.e." in casual conversations.

I sincerely can't tell if you're agreeing with me or mocking my position on the issue. I threw you a like anyways. Benefit of the doubt and all.......
 
I would rather someone just grow some balls [insert joke about liberals believing genitals don't matter, etc.] and say they believe/know nonwhites are genetically inferior or incapable of rational thought.
Used to get that all the time from Greoric
Sooooo much rambling about out group preferences and r/K selection. The best was when he would go off about white people "inventing freedom".
 
ovWfQpK.gif



I will usually post reactions to certain threads because a lot of the main ones in here have lots of racism and misogyny throughout and I just don't want to exchange ideas in that sort of thread. I don't know why it is upsetting? This place is a little more civilized.

Yeah, but you ARE a girl. I wouldn't make fun of you for avoiding us neanderthals.
 
I sincerely can't tell if you're agreeing with me or mocking my position on the issue. I threw you a like anyways. Benefit of the doubt and all.......

I wasn't making any kind of statement. Your post just got me thinking of a silly scenario. It is great to have a natural penis, though. The cisfellas know what I'm talking about.

I don't have any obvious disagreement with your view, though like essie said, some defensiveness is understandable.
 
Last edited:
Funny how that didn't stop you from engaging in that thread, before a bunch of people started making fun of you...

You ran here for friendlier confines, because you're a fragile little girl looking for support. Shut out "The Conners" from your parents' bedroom and grow a sack, ya twat.

I only had replies from you and SDW. I replied to SDW that I would respond at greater length in the off-topic thread.

Would you like to work through your feelings, though? Because you're clearly experiencing a lot of them. This would also be the appropriate place for that. Also, my parents do not watch television in the bedroom. I was with them in their living room on that so-fateful night that you have pathetically grasped to for this silly "you live with your parents" shtick.
 
The cultural values line has always rang hollow but after four years of carrying water for an adulterous sex abusing racist it's just stunning. I saw a tweet from white nationalist Nick Fuentes that criticized Tucker for being too coded with his language, instead of just outright advocating for a white ethnostate. He said this is why conservatism could die out. It made me wonder if that sort of coding will go away or if it is effective.
The thing that keeps that sort of behavior in check politically is how it hurts or helps any given candidate, of course, but it's not equal at all stages of election. If you have a district with an unbreakable partisan gerrymander -i'm talkin iron clad- then the actual contest is between candidates of the same party during the primary. So how much does the racist, hyper partisan bigotry factor in? Well, if your constituents -who have been selected by you through technically precise mapping- are of the sort that share racial grievance power fantasies, well, then they are going to like what they hear and feel empowered voting for someone that has the luxury of saying the quiet part out loud. One thing racist reactionaries hate to the core is that the quiet part ever had to become quiet in the first place. It wasn't very long ago that mainstream political leaders were publicly demanding racial segregation. The last generation that could stand up and proclaim that stuff on the national stage is.... mostly still alive.
 
Used to get that all the time from Greoric
Sooooo much rambling about out group preferences and r/K selection. The best was when he would go off about white people "inventing freedom".

Yeah, he copied that from Molyneux. Also, you saw Michael Anton's notorious piece, right?

https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/digital/the-flight-93-election/

Third and most important, the ceaseless importation of Third World foreigners with no tradition of, taste for, or experience in liberty means that the electorate grows more left, more Democratic, less Republican, less republican, and less traditionally American with every cycle. As does, of course, the U.S. population, which only serves to reinforce the two other causes outlined above. This is the core reason why the Left, the Democrats, and the bipartisan junta (categories distinct but very much overlapping) think they are on the cusp of a permanent victory that will forever obviate the need to pretend to respect democratic and constitutional niceties. Because they are.

Very Greorical. Just like Trots said, worst case is that they're just basically modern American rightists but they don't vote Republican.
 
ovWfQpK.gif



I will usually post reactions to certain threads because a lot of the main ones in here have lots of racism and misogyny throughout and I just don't want to exchange ideas in that sort of thread. I don't know why it is upsetting? This place is a little more civilized.
Well, with certain obvious exceptions, such as the person whining about where the post is located while never contributing anything in the first place.
 
I only had replies from you and SDW. I replied to SDW that I would respond at greater length in the off-topic thread.

Would you like to work through your feelings, though? Because you're clearly experiencing a lot of them. This would also be the appropriate place for that. Also, my parents do not watch television in the bedroom. I was with them in their living room on that so-fateful night that you have pathetically grasped to for this silly "you live with your parents" shtick.

<1>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top