• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social WR Lounge v222 Guys I can’t do everything for you

Who would win a fist fight?


  • Total voters
    38
Status
Not open for further replies.
Shit, those same people will be demanding ID for anyone who posts on social media in the very near future. And COVID certificates...

For some reason, it's just when it comes to voting, it becomes just so harrrrrd(and racist) for people to get some form of identification to participate. Hmm...weird.
You spelled deliberate wrong, son.
 
Pretty sweet “RIP Mr. Hands” tattoo

He has some pretty good hand tattoos. I can't decide between worker a scissor flycatcher curled up with the tail going to down my thumb and index finger but I already have my knuckles done.

Its like neck tattoos, most side neck tattoos look shitty bit I love throat pieces. Always wanted one.

Rarely keep the sides.of my mohawk shaved but I've always thought about getting both sides of my head tattooed. Like I said I've had a mohawk like half my life. If I ever get tired of having jead tattoos I'll just grow my hair out lol.
The point is that voting doesn't mean shit without force to back up the results. And that we just watched mob violence all Summer employed in an effort to get their rights recognized. There's a reason every government is armed.

Historically speaking though, riots/marches/ and general strikes have been far more successful. The US is now so divided based on looking down on anyone poorer than you that a general strike is unlikely. Which is by design considering the absolute slander of unions and post Reagan labor policy.
 
Whether elections are smooth or not is irrelevant to verification of those who vote, no? Actually it could be very relevant, depending on the perspective.
It isn't irrelevant at all. Adding extra, unnecessary steps to a system that already is among the best in the country is bass-ackwards and would reduce the quality of our voting apparatus. It is a fact that we vote by mail with virtually no fraud.
 
Having trouble with reading comprehension? Got that pissbelt wrapped around your head? I told you in that post.
Wow you're really emotional. Kinda like a 12 year old. All I read was some whiney little crying and lies.
 
This is why it's a great thing that Jefferson was a man of the people. We needed that antagonistic view point, opposed from Adams, Hamilton and those who felt the government was God.
Hamilton was a real nut case sometimes. Well, maybe a lot of the times. He could basically be a straight up monarchist on Wednesday, then flip a u-turn by Friday.
 
Historically speaking though, riots/marches/ and general strikes have been far more successful. The US is now so divided based on looking down on anyone poorer than you that a general strike is unlikely. Which is by design considering the absolute slander of unions and post Reagan labor policy.

And I'll add that nobody's voting status ever prevented them from being robbed, raped, beaten, or murdered.
 
It isn't irrelevant at all. Adding extra, unnecessary steps to a system that already is among the best in the country is bass-ackwards and would reduce the quality of our voting apparatus. It is a fact that we vote by mail with virtually no fraud.
I'm thinking about the gaps inbetween the "virtually", though. How is it that someone can fraud the government, social security, alcohol and tobacco, etc. but not attempt to fraud the voting process? My point is that even though it's a low number, I'd rather us be closer to 0 than 1 in regards to voter fraud.
 
I’ve personally had to reacquire my social and I still don’t know where my original birth certificate is.

it’s a headache just like ALL dealings with the social security office, but it’s not something that an adult who isn’t severely mentally handicapped can’t handle.

The only semi-valid excuse I hear is taking time out of work and the fact of the matter is you can always explain to your employer that in a months time you have an appointment with social security and if you cannot afford ONE day off?

Apply for some government assistance so that one days earning of minimum wage doesn’t get you thrown into the street.

I was raised by a stressed out single mother and my dad is to this day a drug addict who never helped us out. Im Latino and I’m not a lawyer and I’m not particularly successful, and I know what stressing over finances is like.

The fact of the matter is that people in such horrible situations that they don’t even have a freaking ID, they just don’t vote, so it’s mainly a distraction anyways.

Well, unless some can provide me some evidence to the contrary.
What in the flying fuck would you know about not being able to afford a day off? I've been in situations where I couldn't get one single fucking day off outside my scheduled time off unless I were willing to quit. And I'm a single man. There are many other situations where someone, say a single mother, might be consumed with two things, taking care of her kids and working while making barely enough money to get by. Go ahead and be the fuckface that tells her, "Hey, surely you can afford a day off, right?"

Fuck right off with that shit.
 
I'm thinking about the gaps inbetween the "virtually", though. How is it that someone can fraud the government, social security, alcohol and tobacco, etc. but not attempt to fraud the voting process? My point is that even though it's a low number, I'd rather us be closer to 0 than 1 in regards to voter fraud.
Well we can postulate anything we want with the power of imagination. Here in the real world version of Oregon, though, there's virtually no fraud whatsoever. We have safe, secure elections that are easy to participate in.
 
Yeah, shocked me at first, but then I realized that there might have been signs of I was looking for them. It will be interesting to look back at some of their older videos.
Incredible historian and a voice like silk. I discovered her through the philosophy of Antifa video, and while it's very clearly based on (and acknowledged) Brays incredible book. The tone of those videos is always on point. Makes you feel like you're listening in on a secret.

I'm WAY different when I talk history, I get way too excited. People enjoy it to be fair. But it's nice to see a more measured delivery.
 
Wow you're really emotional. Kinda like a 12 year old. All I read was some whiney little crying and lies.
So, I was right. You have your pissbelt wound too tight and you don't understand English. I'll put it so even you can understand, fuck off.
 
Oh for sure. Think about our own revolution; after throwing off the British, what did hte Founding Fathers turn around and do? Violently suppress all the poor ass people that decided they didn't want the new government, either. My point though is that force itself isn't a system of administration, only a means to an end (at best). It's true that laws without enforcement aren't really laws, but a government without laws isn't even a government to begin with... and laws aren't determined by legislators getting out on some parliamentary floor and having a shoot out.
Exactly, and way better than I’m capable of articulating. But I expect nothing less from a smarty pants historian slash home efficiency expert.
If we’re going with guns over votes then let’s just be anarchists or accept feudalism. I’d make an awesome lord so I’m kinda torn, tbh.
 
Well we can postulate anything we want with the power of imagination. Here in the real world version of Oregon, though, there's virtually no fraud whatsoever. We have safe, secure elections that are easy to participate in.
How does one prove anything without proof of residency/citizenship, though? I understand we're talking real hypotheticals, but I don't understand how my baby faced 33 year old ass still needs to show an ID to buy a pack of cigs or a 12 pack, when there is no verification or care in terms of voting for local/state/federal government.
 
Go ahead, talk shit about poor people. Be my guest. Reminds me of Shapiro saying people can just sell their homes if climate change floods them out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top