- Joined
- Nov 2, 2017
- Messages
- 15,557
- Reaction score
- 12,386
For some reason this thread makes me want coke and hookers....
We've got an airdrop ready, send me your location.....
For some reason this thread makes me want coke and hookers....
We've got an airdrop ready, send me your location.....
I do not agree. I do not know what Jesus was, if he existed at all, but the rise and dominance of Abrahamic religions is the direct result of their re-design and usage as political instruments of control.Saying religion was designed is like saying politics was designed. Neither were designed, they both arose as largely social expressions of evolved biology.
Now, saying Religion and indeed any power structure usually results in the dominance of the more successful over the less successful is imo more accurate.
About the only major religion one can level such claims on is Scientology, being created whole cloth, by one man for the expressed purpose of doing so.
Others are largely much, much more organic than that.
Jesus was an anti capitalist, anti centralist. His teachings are very much the opposite of what you suggest. People of course use any structure to their advantage and organised religion, and indeed organised almost anything is garbage as a result.
Except getting robbed or divorced.It's better to have money rather than not in most situations in life.
I do not agree. I do not know what Jesus was, if he existed at all, but the rise and dominance of Abrahamic religions is the direct result of their re-design and usage as political instruments of control.
Religion as a phenomenon was not designed as a tool of power, I agree, and was not created per se but sprouted from mankind's innate need to explain the unknown and give things meaning.That they were used by people, as a power structure they could manipulate is without question. The matter was however whether religion was designed for such. I argue that it was not. That religion is an extension of ourselves and that the manipulation of power structure for our advantage is also an extension of ourselves, they often coincide but correlation is not causation.
Which one would be better?
If you're poor and you're dying, it's a small step down.
If you're rich and you're on your death bed, you have billions in your bank account, you're in your mega mansion on your bed, thinking about all the things you still want to do with all your money, thinking about your company that you ran for decades wondering what's going to happen to it.