I don't usually spell out the context, because its implied, but I will do so for you now:
Maia is being compared to his peers in my statement. In this respect, ALL of his opponents are 'elite' in regards to MMA competition by virtue of being signed to the big show.
Within that group, we can then index in who is 'average' among the best fighters in the world. That would be where Maia has made most of his wins. Condit and Magny stand alone in this respect for him. Condit has since retired, citing brain trauma.
Fitch was top 5 when Maia sent him to wsof, so that's an elite win as well, unless you revision history like you seem to be alluding to with your Condit footnote. Masvidal was and still is top 5. Add those to your list of you want some type of validity. Your spelling out context reads a lot like your opinion.
Do you know who else has beaten Matt Brown, Kendell Grove and Rick Story? Everybody.
Cool, Maia beat all of the above despite them being more well rounded than him.
When Maia has faced elite competition, he has come up short repeatedly. Marquardt, Silva, Munoz, Weidman, Shields, Rory, Woodley.
Sonnen, magny, masvidal, Condit, Fitch.
He was able to sneak past Masvidal with a split decision.
Just like shields squeeked by Maia with a split decision.
If only Masvidal was more well rounded, right? Then he would have got the SD.
NO. I did not say that. Former multiple time world champion Dominick Cruz said that, verbatim, on the PPV broadcast. I am agreeing with his statement.
What difference does it make who said it if it's you who is standing by and supporting the notion?
What game are you playing? It goes without saying that the more competency you have in all metrics, the more successful you will be.
No. The more competency you have in general is what's most important, and Maia has proved this time and time again by beating g fighters who were more well rounded then him. Conor also proved this by beating fighters who are more well rounded than him--it's about overall competency, irregardless of whether or not it's well rounded competency.
I've seen your other posts and this seems to be something of a blind-spot for you, regarding Maia. You're better than this. This is not a worthwhile argument to make, and you know it.
It's a blind spot for you as well my friend. You have a clear ideology and you're cherry picking evidence in order to support it, which we're all guilty of from time to time.
What Maia has done repeatedly is lose to the elite fighters he's faced, save Condit, who retired citing brain trauma. There is a reason Dom made the statement that he did.
Dom has been wrong plenty of times. He should worry about being more well rounded, since that's clearly why he lost to Cody. There's no way it could have been a tactical or physical issue. After all, when fighters lose, it means they're not well rounded enough, right? Or does that only apply to the few times when Maia loses?
Maia has beaten more top guys than just Condit--I've gone over that. What I'm saying is that Maia losing to elite fighters doesn't correlate to "Maia not being well rounded enough." Maia losing from time to time doesn't prove that at all, despite how much you want it to validate your opinion. Unless of course you mean it in the most basic sense, in which case every fighter who has ever lost lost because they weren't well rounded enough. In that case...okay.
Plenty of fighters more well rounded than Maia lost to Silva, Weidman, Rory, and Woodley. Look at that list of names right there; it's a tough fucking list of guys to beat, regardless of style. Acting like losing to those guys is simply because he lacks diverse dimensions to his game is a disingenuous blanket statement.
What I wonder is this: why are you so obsessed with pointing out Maia's single minded game as if it's a weaknesses when plenty of fighters who have a more well rounded style--which correct me if I'm wrong, seems to be what you think is superior considering you say Maia loses because he lacks that well rounded quality--haven't had careers nearly as good as Maia's?