WMMA is the best it's ever been right now and yet...

And no soul
She's come back from difficult positions in fights that she still finished, so not sure what you mean.
If you mean something like "I know her like her own psychologist would", no, you don't.
 
Uh oh ts, wmma cucks will serve you with their m one insult....you're insecure!

LOL
 
it is still terrible. So bad. Such insane low output.

Holm is so overrated it's not even funny. She has good defensive footwork and that's about it. Really slow hands. She has powerful kicks but she telegraphs every single one of them. I will forever treasure the moment she knocked out Rotunda Rousey but she's pretty bad. Which of course, makes Rousey substantially worse.

She also punches and kicks a lot of air, almost like she has terrible depth perception.

Great person though, just not a great fighter.

Cyborg would annihilate any of these girls.
agreed! What Holm also is good at is screaming to every air-punch she throws.
 
They need more time

WMMA like UFC 1 has to suck before it gets better
 
it is still terrible. So bad. Such insane low output.

Holm is so overrated it's not even funny. She has good defensive footwork and that's about it. Really slow hands. She has powerful kicks but she telegraphs every single one of them. I will forever treasure the moment she knocked out Rotunda Rousey but she's pretty bad. Which of course, makes Rousey substantially worse.

She also punches and kicks a lot of air, almost like she has terrible depth perception.

Great person though, just not a great fighter.

Cyborg would annihilate any of these girls.
sometimes, no replies are needed for a thread...gg
 
WMMA is evolving but it has a long way to go. Many fighters are still basically one dimensional. This can lead to very conservative strategies trying to avoid the other fighter's strengths (e.g. Holm in the Tate fight). But I think we are in the process of moving to more rounded and more aggressive fighters.
 
WMMA is evolving but it has a long way to go. Many fighters are still basically one dimensional. This can lead to very conservative strategies trying to avoid the other fighter's strengths (e.g. Holm in the Tate fight). But I think we are in the process of moving to more rounded and more aggressive fighters.
This.
Two MMA for the price of one.
The current MMA, and the WMMA, a.k.a. the 10-years-ago MMA, the old-school MMA.

It introduces diversity in the game, and that's not bad.
 
Of course the men are more skilled, there are more man competing than woman, and for a longer time. But I have no idea what do you mean with 'terrible', there are a lot of upsets, lot of exciting matchups, and also there are lot of fighters with good technique there.

Before bashing WMMA, let's not forget that Michael Bisping is a champion and 'MMA is the best its ever been right now'. Bisping isn't particularly skilled in anything, and YES, there are women with better striking/ground skills than him.
 
same old shit, dont like it?, dont watch it
 
Back
Top