- Joined
- Feb 10, 2006
- Messages
- 27,417
- Reaction score
- 729
I don't know about the other guy, but I'm damn sure cute.Lol he's got a cheerleader now. You guys are cute.
I don't know about the other guy, but I'm damn sure cute.Lol he's got a cheerleader now. You guys are cute.
Nice save. The left has recently boycotted the 2 fast food chains with reputations for the absolute best employee treatment(chik-fil-a and in and out) in the entire industry just for not being democrats. Threatening to boycott sponsors if a show or host isn't taken off the air is a regular thing. They tried to boycott the entire state of NC over tranny bathroom problems ffs.Lol at that link
You \/\/
A bunch of those aren't even Americans. And lol st trying to compare a bunch of virtue signaling cuckservatives crying on twitter for boycotts based on hurt feels vs some of those on your list over human rights abuses.
But let's continue the right wing butt hurt boycott tour:
Amazon
Ben and Jerry's
Netflix
Macy's
Nabisco
Pepsi
Anheuser-Busch
Apple
And now Willie Nelson. What a joke.
Nice save. The left has recently boycotted the 2 fast food chains with reputations for the absolute best employee treatment(chik-fil-a and in and out) in the entire industry just for not being democrats. Threatening to boycott sponsors if a show or host isn't taken off the air is a regular thing. They tried to boycott the entire state of NC over tranny bathroom problems ffs.
You wanna maybe provide a link for any of the ones you've listed? I don't recall any of those, and they didn't do any harm to any of those places, so it obviously wasn't any significant boycott.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-boycott-retailers-sell-trump-products-2017-1
https://grabyourwallet.org/
I've never listened to his music, and yet I could have guessed his reasons. Any cameo he's ever had in a movie or on TV feels like it's been a gag on his fondness for marijuana.If you didn’t know Willie’s politics then you aren’t a real fan. He hasn’t hidden it.
https://www.businessinsider.com/conservatives-boycott-brands-keurig-nfl-starbucks-2017-11
http://boycottleftwingers.com
https://m.ranker.com/list/trump-supporter-boycott/jacob-shelton
Of course no right wing boycott has a real effect. Fly over state voters dont have enough influence on multinational brands.
They know. It's election time. Willy made a political statement. Now a segment of his fanbase are making theirs. Fair play.If you didn’t know Willie’s politics then you aren’t a real fan. He hasn’t hidden it.
Did you read your own links? Half are companies added to the "support list" and the other half are responses to companies caving to boycotts from the left, and most are tweets from individual people. Nike(who the left has boycotted themselves), Yeti(who retracted their stance) and Dick's are the only ones that had anything behind them.
But you listed In-N-Out which wasn't boycotted by "the left" and was only suggested by some Democrat in CA that retracted that suggestion two days lateer but I guess that meets your standard for "having anything behind them" or are you just being a hypocrite?
Did you read your own links? Half are companies added to the "support list" and the other half are responses to companies caving to boycotts from the left, and most are tweets from individual people. Nike(who the left has boycotted themselves), Yeti(who retracted their stance) and Dick's are the only ones that had anything behind them.
And yet when there are studies supporting the right being more charitable, the old "that's because the right has more money" excuse is tossed around. Ah well.Most right wing boycott attempts are mostly born out of the power progressive ideology has on American arts, entertainment, culture and economics.
Why do you think companies are inclusive in advertising to LGBT, interracial families, immigrants and non-christian religions? Because progressives have much more buying power and thus influence.
Right wing boycotts are typically weak reactions to this progressive influence.
Only because it includes donations to their churches.And yet when there are studies supporting the right being more charitable, the old "that's because the right has more money" excuse is tossed around. Ah well.
Which is still charitable. Also churches (most of them at least) are very charitable by forwarding those donations to the their and other communities. However, that is not my point. My point is the "that's because the right has more money" excused in the face of "the right a bunch of paupers with no spending power" put-down. It's amusing. Much like listening to someone say that Americans have no culture, then go on to complain about how American culture has supplanted certain aspects of foreign cultures.Only because it includes donations to their churches.
Which is still charitable. Also churches (most of them at least) are very charitable by forwarding those donations to the their and other communities. However, that is not my point. My point is the "that's because the right has more money" excused in the face of "the right a bunch of paupers with no spending power" put-down. It's amusing.
How can anyone vote for Ted Cruz?
Scroll up from this postWho said that? Stop your shitposting.