Wikileaks releases over 2,000 emails from Clinton campaign chair (John Podesta) UPDATED

[second sight]

Tap to Zoom

“I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren’t satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.”

That’s what we call a smoking gun. This should end Hillary Clinton in the public eye. It won’t. That’s why we need Trump.

*** It shows that Hillary Clinton reviewed and deleted the emails herself.

http://www.libertywritersnews.com/2...the-smoking-gun-thatll-put-hillary-in-prison/

 

[Greoric]

The head executive is elected democratically...

Stopped here. And when they're in office can they do anything codified outside the enumerated powers in the constitution?

 

[TreeOfWoe]

Obama is nowhere near as weak as Jimmy Carter but he's gotten way weaker the closer he's gotten to leaving office.

Hillary's stance of continuing to overthrow leaders in the MENA region is going to cause a war. She wants a no-fly zone in Syria, and that will cause a war.

True, forgot about Carter. But the current geopolitical situation is really a disaster. We can only hope the US military brass prevents any idiotic decision starting a war against Russia/Syria/Iran with the no fly zone idea.

 

[Hans Gruber]

Anyone who is still voting for the Hag after seeing these leaks is out of their goddamn mind.

If it wasn't for a media blackout she would be done.

Hillary saying that she wanted Open Borders should have done her in.

Can;t believe that people are going to vote for this scumbag just because she has a D by her name

 

[second sight]

If it wasn't for a media blackout she would be done

image where we would be without the internet and what will happen to the internet because of this

 

[Hans Gruber]

 

[second sight]

Date: 2016-03-12 19:41 Subject: Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance

Hi. Yes, it is one she gets asked about. Not everyone likes her answer but can share it. Betsaida - can you send her answer on death penalty? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Donna Brazile <[email protected]> wrote: Here's one that worries me about HRC. DEATH PENALTY 19 states and the District of Columbia have banned the death penalty. 31 states, including Ohio, still have the death penalty. According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S. That’s 11% of Americans who were sentenced to die, but later exonerated and freed. Should Ohio and the 30 other states join the current list and abolish the death penalty? Sent from Donna's I Pad. Follow me on twitter @donnabrazile

 

[Space]

Dunno if this has been posted yet:

 

[in the]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4930

John, the Roberts bill will be introduced on Monday night and it is now
highly likely that a very bad "compromise" version will pass the senate this week and be approved by the House and on its way to the White House within a very short period. I can promise you that if President Obama signs this terrible legislation that blatantly validates Bernie's entire campaign message about Wall Street running our government, this will give Bernie a huge boost and 10,000 -20,000 outraged citizens ( who WILL turn up because they will be so angry at the President for preemption vt) will be marching on the Mall with Bernie as their keynote speaker. In short, I feel certain that Obama (who famously promised on camera to implement mandatory GMO labeling) signing this bill will result in adding at least another month or more of money and attention to the Sanders campaign.


To avoid this, this bill can still be stopped if the WH and Clinton campaign come down now on the 12-14 farm state dems who Roberts will need to pass this compromise.


I am on a plane until 6:30 pm EST but can talk after that. I am also passing the same message to David Simas.


It will be terrible to hand Sanders this advantage at such a fragile time when we really need to save our $$$ for the Trump fight. We should discuss with your team immediately.


Gh A
Sent from my iPhone >




Yep, that's the Clinton campaign trying to stop President Obama from signing the Roberts Bill because it would have validated Bernie's campaign message (and give him another month of funding).

 

[Fawlty]

Stopped here. And when they're in office can they do anything codified outside the enumerated powers in the constitution?

You're trying to obfuscate the cynical and frankly stupid remark you first engaged me with.

I'm holding you to it. No dice, Darling.

 

[Greoric]

You're trying to obfuscate the cynical and frankly stupid remark you first engaged me with.

I'm holding you to it. No dice, Darling.

You'd love to think I was obfuscating wouldn't you? Anyhow, noted. You're holding me to your ignorant comment.

 

[Fawlty]

You'd love to think I was obfuscating wouldn't you? Anyhow, noted. You're holding me to your ignorant comment.

Yes, you cynically said, like a high school sophomore, that we don't live in a democracy. I challenged you to back that up in light of the non-establishment populist surge toward one of two democratically elected branches of government- one surge being successful. You failed to do so, and tried to pretend I don't understand what the difference between a republic and a democracy is.

So, back to you. If you stand by your comment that I fail to realize we don't live in a democracy, let's see you back it up. And don't be a cloudtossing pussy about it, be an honest person.

 

[Greoric]

Yes, you cynically said, like a high school sophomore, that we don't live in a democracy. I challenged you to back that up in light of the non-establishment populist surge toward one of two democratically elected branches of government- one surge being successful. You failed to do so, and tried to pretend I don't understand what the difference between a republic and a democracy is.

So, back to you. If you stand by your comment that I fail to realize we don't live in a democracy, let's see you back it up. And don't be a cloudtossing pussy about it, be an honest person.

Ok, I'm tired of playing grab ass with this.

Dude, because the "populist" democratically elected representatives do not rule democratically. They still have to follow the rule of law as set and limited by the BoR and enumerated powers of the constitution.

Hence, however representatives are put in power we are a constitutional republic, and NOT a democracy. Understand now, yes?

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

You'd love to think I was obfuscating wouldn't you? Anyhow, noted. You're holding me to your ignorant comment.

Ask him what's the worst he's ever said when it comes to wanting to fuck a woman and see if he comes across as genuine for a change.

 

[Fawlty]

Ok, I'm tired of playing grab ass with this.

Dude, because the "populist" democratically elected representatives do not rule democratically. They still have to follow the rule of law as set and limited by the BoR and enumerated powers of the constitution.

Hence, however representatives are put in power we are a constitutional republic, and NOT a democracy. Understand now, yes?

But you already know I understand the difference between a republic and democracy in those terms. Now you're just throwing another cloud my way. We're past that. I'm basic civics class certified.

Do you have a point beyond that? Or do you now consider your stupid cynical comment to be justified by changing the subject?

 

[Greoric]

Ask him what's the worst he's ever said when it comes to wanting to fuck a woman and see if he comes across as genuine for a change.

I haven't engaged him much. Does he have a tendency to be particularly disingenuous, or just embarrassed and flaky when he makes a silly comment?

 

[Greoric]

Do you have a point beyond that?

None. I crown you victor for wasting yours, and infinitely worse, my time.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I haven't engaged him much. Does he have a tendency to be particularly disingenuous, or just embarrassed and flaky when he makes a silly comment?

Seems like a dude who will go to the barricades for the liberal/democrat agenda/narrative. Seems educated, but without substance. Like a literature major.

 

[Greoric]

Seems like a dude who will go to the barricades for the liberal/democrat agenda/narrative. Seems educated, but without substance. Like a literature major.

Poor guy, getting a mortgage without any marketable skills to work at Starbucks. If I was God-king of the US I would outlaw humanities.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Poor guy, getting a mortgage without any marketable skills to work at Starbucks. If I was God-king of the US I would outlaw humanities.

lol.