- Joined
- May 25, 2013
- Messages
- 218
- Reaction score
- 0
Interesting read from an aussie based in the USA on this topic. Basically it argues that there isn't a deep state but the very media that is meant to destroy that argument is actually helping perpetuate it.
Which is why it’s a bit of mystery why The New York Times ran it. To be sure, there is something titillating about the insider voice. But to offer the cloak of anonymity without demanding details about genuine resistance to Trump is to get the short end of the stick. More than that: it helps advance a conspiracy theory that not only misleads Americans about how their government functions, but helps wean them away from a reliance on fact-based reporting — very thing the Times was created to defend.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/wo...deep-state-20180909-p502ng.html?crpt=homepage
Which is why it’s a bit of mystery why The New York Times ran it. To be sure, there is something titillating about the insider voice. But to offer the cloak of anonymity without demanding details about genuine resistance to Trump is to get the short end of the stick. More than that: it helps advance a conspiracy theory that not only misleads Americans about how their government functions, but helps wean them away from a reliance on fact-based reporting — very thing the Times was created to defend.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/wo...deep-state-20180909-p502ng.html?crpt=homepage