- Joined
- Aug 19, 2024
- Messages
- 1,035
- Reaction score
- 1,219
Why most MMA promotions fail and struggle to develop ?
The UFC is the only organization that is extremely profitable, after all, that is natural, as they were the first to take it to the next level.
Some organizations like KSW & ACA are quite profitable, with stable sources of income, which means that they are likely to remain for the next 10 years. Rizin is doing quite well, Oktogon also deserves an honorable mention. PFL despite having larger finances than Rizin, is in the red. One is also in the orange/red since a couple of years.
Mistake 1 - Too much Ambition than they can afford – Expansion before profit
The first mistake from an organization is the ambition and dream of being number one directly, and thus dethroning the UFC rather than focusing on profitability first, before expansion.
As the more you expand into territories, into countries, into signing contracts, the more fuel of money you will burn, and it is not a sprint but a long term oriented game.
In layman’s term : You don’t have to be number one to succeed, but you have to be profitable to survive.
Profitability even if small will enable survival, and later on will draw more investors to invest into your corporation, enabling a slow but guaranteed expansion.
An MMA organiaztion is before anything it could be, a corporation, and corporation must be profit oriented, not expansion oriented.
It is not about how big you are, but about how profitable you are. So, if you are big and not profitable, being big becomes a disadvantage, because the bigger you are, if not profitable, the bigger your losses will be, the more faster you will burn cash, the sooner you will end up on the red, and you will be forced to have to make choices from urgency :
Option 1 : Reduce the numbers of events you do (One), which would make your organization an inactivity trap.
Option 2 : Reduce the money you pay to your fighers (PFL), dividing 1 million dollar tournament bonus per two).
In both case you are slowing down your pace, because you know you are in the red sprinting, and you know that you will fall apart if you don’t slow down, which means that when you are not profitable and big, the bigger you are, the faster you will burn cash without making back profits, the sooner you will fall into survival mode and getting closed to bankrupcy.
Mistake 2 - Overpaying cans and post prime washed fighters
Many former UFC fighters, legends or not, stars or not, went into others organizations like Bellator(Gone in 2025), and now into PFL and others.
First, who are they ? This a phenomen that is common since the last 10 years. This is an emerging type of fighter.
The world of MMA is ruthless, he is in his 40 or around his 40, and is often broke, due to poor income made out of his career, or due to mediocre money management, if not both, in other words, he is in despair for a paycheck, to milk the left over of money that he can make out of his career. Of course, he did not consider being or becoming a world class trainer and paving the way for the new generation, or becoming a manager, or even a promoter, as they are others options and alternatives to remain in the game. Also, this can be quite dangerous for himself, some fighters have cumulated injuries, especially around the brain, which means that making them fights more and more could be harmful to their health, and to their well-beings.
Let’s call this type of fighter TOPPIHWF, the old post prime injured hungerless washed fighters.
You should avoid signing these types of fighters, especially in big quantities. Paying 500K/700K/900K per fight a TOPPIHWF fighter is a mistake, in most case, and always a mistake when the TOPPIHWF fighter is fighting another TOPPIHWF fighter.
The first question is, when you pay 500K/700K/900K/ dollars a guy, young or old, it doesn’t matter, do you make back the same amount of money that you have invested on him ? On the short term ? No/Yes, if no, do you make anything interesting with him on the long run ? No/Yes, if both answers are no, you are only making a mistake.
Absolutely not, the answer is no, let's call TOPPIHWF fighter like, Tom.
Tom is 41 years old,
4 losing streak
Did not fight since 10 months
Do not draw crowd
Which means that if you make 3 events with Tom as a main event, and gave him three fights, you just lost 1,5 to 2 millions dollars. Do that with ten TOPPIHWF like fighters, you end up wasting 5 to 20 millions dollars.
That kind of fighter draw no crowd. And are good for nothing, expect burning cash, and in 2,3 years, they are gone, they are retired. Gone with the money you invested on them. That is why investing on younger fighters is often better, especially prospect, as in 5/7 years, if you did not release them and if you did not go bankrupt, they would still be there. Would it have been better to bring killers prospects from all over the world then overpaying cans ? Certainly.
Do you want your organization to be retirement home, or a room full of killers ?
Bellator was called by TOPPIHWF like fighters, retirement home, and Bellator CEO Scott Coker at that time, realized his mistake, and stated publicly that he will stop signing old men into his organization and focus on the youth, but that was already too late.
Mistake 3 - Not understanding the two steps of the game, depth of roster, and promotion of roster
Besides logistics, accomodations, attracting investors, visa issues for fighters and staff, and keeping shareholders happy, there is one simple goal : Making Money.
Money. In other words, profitability. And there are two steps to do that.
Step 1 : Have a product to sell
Step 2 : Sell your product
Step 3 : Cash out your work
- Step 1 is having a deep roster, of prospects mostly, and of capable elite fighters. No-one is interested in watching cans fighting cans, and the fans are more and more educated. You just can’t lie to people, even if a majority remains blind to what fighting really is.
To have a deep roster, you would need a recruitment team, the main obstacle is going to be salary during negotations, as your have competitors, that can keep the price up, a good prospect will consider with his manager signing to three or four different organizations, and will often sign with the highest bidder. Then you will have visa issues who can be quite problematic.
- Step 2 is simply promoting your fighters, and most importantly events, their highlights, their stories, in social media, which is cheap to set up and not expensive.
Bellator was very poor at that, extremely poor passive marketing, in 2020, Yaroslav Amosov was 26-0 4 times Sambo champion, fighting Logan Storley 11-0 4 times NCAA wrestling champion, it was a battle of the undefeated, and a title fight, the product was very good to sell, but was not sold well at all. The fight happened, even some of the hardcore fans who knew both fighters, before the fight, they were not aware of the fight taking place in the first place, and after the fight, they were not aware of the given results. It was only months later, that when they checked their tapology and sherdog resume to peak for their next fight, that they realized that they had fought.
Most UFC fighters who went to Bellator, after fighting in Bellator, some of their fans on the streets would call them, and ask them when they will fight again, even if they already fought a few months ago / weeks ago.
The UFC simply has a monopoly of audience, yes, perhaps, but that is not a reason to not market your product especially if good properly. Create & orquestrate dramas, and beefs, promote fighters well, and do your job. How can you make money out of your fighters fighting when no-one literally is aware of them fighting ? The fighting business, is part of the entertainment business. Marketing is key.
Mistake 4 - Not rating your fighters properly : With ranks & metrics
There are two ways to rate a fighter.
In all organizations, it would be wiser to give each fighter a metric, with the example of fighter A.
Popularity Rank – Fighting Rank
- Popularity Rank : How famous is fighter A. How many people are talking about him, interested in following him, how many PPV will he sells, how deep is his fanbase, how many people care about watching him win or lose ?
- Fighting Rank : How good is the fighter, his skills, and most importantly his achievements. As skills and performances are not the same things as one is the consequence of the other.
The popularity rank do not make the fighting rank better, CM PUNK is a perfect example of that, but the fighting rank increases the popularity rank. A good example is a finishing elite opponents like Topuria, who increased massively his popularity rank with his insane performances and thus his salary. The better you perform, the better you will be popular = More money for the fighter and for his organization
The biggest draws of the sport, were fighters with a high popularity rank and a high skill rank, such as Khabib Numargomedov, and Jon Jones.
In the case of two fighters, fighter A and fighter B.
Fighter A is undefeated, 10-0 with 9 finishes rate.
Fighter B is 12-4 with a 3 fights win streak.
Fighter A has 1000 instagrams followers.
Fighter B has 20K instagrams followers.
Fighter A has a superior fighting rank than fighter B, but fighter B has a larger audience.
It is to know that when signing fighters, organizations follow their social media, as it changes their salaries, and not just records.
To simplify, skills with achievements can build and improve popularity, popularity do not improve skills.
If we were to bring experts, and gave each expert to rate a fighter's popularity rank and a fighter's fighting rank, you would notice that some assets within your organization are more valuable than others.
It is a strategical game on a long run timeline. You just can’t waste tons of money on fighters who are neither popular and especially neither good. Simply because it is a mistake.
The popularity rank and the fighting rank evolves with time, injuries, scandals, dramas, success, winstreaks, controversies and losses.
Popularity as a ranking metric, can only most of time be increased or remain, people are less likely to forget a name, popularity is by nature exponential.
As the opposite of skills, who can go backward, especially when fighters are behind their primes, injured, out of shape, and the ring rust of inactivity.
You can simply rank the fighting rank of a fighter by the results of his last three fights or his last fight within the last 2 years. In fact some will say that you are only good as your last fight.
Popularity is easier to rank than skills of course.
Also, some youtubers in boxing exibitions made solid money, not because of skills but because of popularity. Popularity can attract crowd, but only skills can keep a fighter relevant in the long run. Losses will affect popularity somehow, no-one is interested in losers who keep losing. Marlon Moraes is a good example of that. Despite him being a beast to be reckoned with, before fighting Cejudo for a title fight, he lost 4 fights in a row into the UFC, before going to PFL, and of course no-one cared about his PFL debut, simply because fans have shifted their attention on more relevant emerging fighters.
Ordinary performances must be given ordinary rewards, and extraordinary performances extraordinary rewards, and for that metrics are needed.
Last edited:

