Total fights of champions in 2025

I'm not certain, but I feel like the main difference now is the fact that champs are fighting this little while healthy, where as while champs were just as inactive before, they typically were out injured.
 
That's not even one fight per champ per month for the entire year. Jesus Christ. When we talk about product dilution this is it right here.
No, there were actually 14 men’s UFC title fights in 2025, so more than one per month. Jesus has nothing to do with this
 
Joshua Van has 4 because he was not champion in 3 of them.

As soon as the belt is put around them it's immediately "none of these guys are worth my time", "I want the money fight", "need some time off", etc...
I’ve noticed that too, I definitely think a lot of that is mental as much as it is physical. If you’ve been a top 5/10 guy for a while and been rattling off wins you’ve probably been motivated to get to the title. Once you have it you kind of have to reassess why you’re getting up to do roadwork at 5am and figure out another way to push yourself in the gym.
 
Blame the UFC. They allow this inactivity. Defend or vacate.
Some version of this has been echoed over the years from fans, and it has always completely missed the point. The UFC doesn't "allow" this inactivity. The champions aren't dictating to the UFC. The UFC actually wants their highest earners to be relatively inactive. This is the UFC's business model: put one title fight at the top of the card, and stack the rest with cheap labor. It keeps overhead down and maximizes profit.

We constantly hear from fighters who are frustrated because the UFC has them on ice. There's a reason.

In theory, I agree that the UFC shouldn't placate money-fight seekers, religious holiday holdouts, rank-squatters, etc. But these things don't actually hinder the UFC's schedule.
 
Some version of this has been echoed over the years from fans, and it has always completely missed the point. The UFC doesn't "allow" this inactivity. The champions aren't dictating to the UFC. The UFC actually wants their highest earners to be relatively inactive. This is the UFC's business model: put one title fight at the top of the card, and stack the rest with cheap labor. It keeps overhead down and maximizes profit.

We constantly hear from fighters who are frustrated because the UFC has them on ice. There's a reason.

In theory, I agree that the UFC shouldn't placate money-fight seekers, religious holiday holdouts, rank-squatters, etc. But these things don't actually hinder the UFC's schedule.

They allowed Jon Jones to not unify his title. Now, was that by design because it was good for business? Your ass it was.
 
Joshua Van has 4 because he was not champion in 3 of them.

As soon as the belt is put around them it's immediately "none of these guys are worth my time", "I want the money fight", "need some time off", etc...

"I've got 2 fights left on my contract then I'm going over to boxing"
 
It's been this way in the UFC forever.

If you want to see fighters fighting 5+ times a year on the regular you need to look at the 90's. There are a few reasons for the volume, not the least of which was generally abysmal pay (you want to make a lot of money, you need to fight a lot). There were also far fewer people in the sport, so filling cards meant the same people appearing regularly. Those guys were actual fighters, enjoying the act of fighting (more and more guys are simply athletes now imo)

Outside of Travis Fulton (whose stats are hard to confirm), Igor Vovchanchyn holds the most fights in a calendar year that I've ever seen (20 in his first year in the sport). 3/4 of the UFC roster has never seen 20 fights total!

That era was fun, and I'm thrilled I got to watch it when it happened. But it ain't ever coming back....
 
Joshua Van has 4 because he was not champion in 3 of them.

As soon as the belt is put around them it's immediately "none of these guys are worth my time", "I want the money fight", "need some time off", etc...
I thought "legacy" was the most recent one...
 
I’ve noticed that too, I definitely think a lot of that is mental as much as it is physical. If you’ve been a top 5/10 guy for a while and been rattling off wins you’ve probably been motivated to get to the title. Once you have it you kind of have to reassess why you’re getting up to do roadwork at 5am and figure out another way to push yourself in the gym.

Wonder also if sometimes, after being champion, the guys start getting crazy revenues on the side so their need to get paid to fight is not the same as before.

Much easier walking around with the belt just creating social content and doing sponsored shit.
Why risk getting punched in the mouth and losing it.
 
Merab didn’t do that. He fought 4 times as the champion in 2025.

Some people don’t like his style. But you can’t be more active than he was as a UFC champion.
Yeah i hate his style, but that alone should've made me shut my mouth.I prefer 10000x more an active champ putting it all on the line all the time like Merab did. BUnch of lazy champs we have spending their whole day filming content, but never fight...

Pereira gets a pass bc he was active before and saved some events and Van ofc he's brand new, but the rest fu** them. There should be a rule, you have to fight at least every 6 months if you have the belt. No interim, nothing, you get stripped. Imagine they would not make US Open this year bc Sinner or whoever has the title was a pus** and wanted to be lazy and party? No other sport doesn't hold the event because 1 guy or 1 team doesnt't want to participate even as the title holders. Show just goes on without them.µ

And this would make champs fight alot more bc they make alot of money outside of the UFC while being the champ. They would never want to be stripped and would fight all the time to keep their status for sponsorships, pods, etc.
 
Back
Top