With barbell curls in particular. I've been lead to believe holding the bar at different lengths makes a difference.
I think I understand, but what about hammer curls vs underhand vs overhand curls? They all work the bicep, so what's the difference?
With kettle bells, the weight
Well if we think about the resistance as a force pulling the object then downwards towards the ground then no it doesn't matter.
If it's either a 15kg DB or KB the force is still the same (15kg x 9,81m/s^2(g) = ~147N). But I have no idea if there's any effect by moment in the resistance. And it can be that my science is flawed but lol, as long as I sound smart, right? :icon_lol:
Like the Dr said, if the force is applied in a straight line the size of the object doesn't matter, as the contact point with the implement is on your hand, reagardles of KB/DB. If you perform a swing, there are of course differences because of other forces applying and an extra/longer moment arm existing between the COG of the KB and your hand.
This, I still question.Aaah, missed that post. But wouldn't there a difference if you hold it like in the middle of this pic:
![]()
I'm not saying that it might increase the resistance infact I don't it does but because of the way the weight is placed it does affect different/more muscles than just holding it so that the COG is "under" the arm.
Aaah, missed that post. But wouldn't there a difference if you hold it like in the middle of this pic:
![]()
I'm not saying that it might increase the resistance infact I don't it does but because of the way the weight is placed it does affect different/more muscles than just holding it so that the COG is "under" the arm.
Aaah, missed that post. But wouldn't there a difference if you hold it like in the middle of this pic:
![]()
I'm not saying that it might increase the resistance infact I don't it does but because of the way the weight is placed it does affect different/more muscles than just holding it so that the COG is "under" the arm.