Opinion Why is saying All Lives Matter, 'wrong?'

surgeyou1 said:
Nope. Because they were pressured by the movement. No officer has ever been arrested that fast. Most would be on paid leave for weeks before anything gets done.

You know this. Stop playing dumb
Click to expand...
Hahahhah you think he's playing?
 
EZZxA5pVcAAlW4F
 
sing along said:
Clearly with BLM, black lives only matter when it pertains to white on black violence. They have no concern for the millions of aborted black babies or for black on black violence. It should matter to them.
Click to expand...
Seems like that should matter to "All lives matter" group as well as all the other races that die by violence, suicide, and poor righteous teachings....but it seems lives only matter to them when BLM states that "black lives matter"
 
This is worth a read, imo.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/06/truth-about-police-violence-and-race-john-perazzo/

Some of the most comprehensive information we have comes from a 2001 Bureau of Justice Statistics report examining incidents where police in the United States used deadly force to kill criminal suspects between 1976 and 1998. During that 23-year span, 42% of all suspects killed by police were black – a figure that comported precisely with the percentage of violent crimes committed by African Americans during that same period. This is enormously significant because we would expect that in police forces not plagued by systemic racism, officers would shoot suspects of various racial or ethnic backgrounds at rates closely resembling their respective involvement in the types of serious crimes most likely to elicit the use of force by police. And indeed, that is exactly what the evidence shows.

How about the rate at which officers killed suspects of other racial or ethnic backgrounds? In 1998, the “black-officer-kills-black-felon” rate was 32 per 100,000 black officers, more than double the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed black felons (14 per 100,000). That same year, the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed white or Hispanic felons (28 per 100,000) was much higher than the “black-officer-kills-white-or-Hispanic-felon” rate of 11 per 100,000.

In 1999, criminologists Geoffrey Alpert and Roger Dunham confirmed once again that police officers were more likely to use force against suspects of their own racial group, than against suspects from another racial group.
 
nhbbear said:
yep. Been saying it for years. We had a murder last night. Black male shot by a black male. Literally, at the scene where it happened, there were protests for blm for the Floyd thing and no one had anything to say about the shooting less than 8 hours earlier.
Click to expand...
Was the killer in a position of authority or just some random guy?
 
Natural Order said:
The specific problem Barack refused to address properly was the black community and their continued idolization of gang/rap/thug/low-brow culture.

The first step to real change in the black community is that they start policing themselves and getting this disgusting mindframe out of their youth......
Click to expand...
I'm not sure but you might be a racist. {<shrug}
 
squeezewax said:
This is worth a read, imo.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/06/truth-about-police-violence-and-race-john-perazzo/

Some of the most comprehensive information we have comes from a 2001 Bureau of Justice Statistics report examining incidents where police in the United States used deadly force to kill criminal suspects between 1976 and 1998. During that 23-year span, 42% of all suspects killed by police were black – a figure that comported precisely with the percentage of violent crimes committed by African Americans during that same period. This is enormously significant because we would expect that in police forces not plagued by systemic racism, officers would shoot suspects of various racial or ethnic backgrounds at rates closely resembling their respective involvement in the types of serious crimes most likely to elicit the use of force by police. And indeed, that is exactly what the evidence shows.

How about the rate at which officers killed suspects of other racial or ethnic backgrounds? In 1998, the “black-officer-kills-black-felon” rate was 32 per 100,000 black officers, more than double the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed black felons (14 per 100,000). That same year, the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed white or Hispanic felons (28 per 100,000) was much higher than the “black-officer-kills-white-or-Hispanic-felon” rate of 11 per 100,000.

In 1999, criminologists Geoffrey Alpert and Roger Dunham confirmed once again that police officers were more likely to use force against suspects of their own racial group, than against suspects from another racial group.
Click to expand...
This is very problematic. Can the mods please delete?
 
LangfordBarrow said:
Was the killer in a position of authority or just some random guy?
Click to expand...

these idiots are like people terrified of sharks-that kill few compared to bee stings. They claim they are mourning these lives and cry in the streets and are so concerned with the few lives taken by police, even accidental ones, yet they ignore the thousands of black lives that didn’t matter because it wasn’t a cop. So concerned with sharks they don’t realize they are standing in a bees nest.
 
nhbbear said:
these idiots are like people terrified of sharks-that kill few compared to bee stings. They claim they are mourning these lives and cry in the streets and are so concerned with the few lives taken by police, even accidental ones, yet they ignore the thousands of black lives that didn’t matter because it wasn’t a cop. So concerned with sharks they don’t realize they are standing in a bees nest.
Click to expand...
Cops are in a position of authority over us. It's not the same as random violence.
 
squeezewax said:
This is worth a read, imo.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/06/truth-about-police-violence-and-race-john-perazzo/

Some of the most comprehensive information we have comes from a 2001 Bureau of Justice Statistics report examining incidents where police in the United States used deadly force to kill criminal suspects between 1976 and 1998. During that 23-year span, 42% of all suspects killed by police were black – a figure that comported precisely with the percentage of violent crimes committed by African Americans during that same period. This is enormously significant because we would expect that in police forces not plagued by systemic racism, officers would shoot suspects of various racial or ethnic backgrounds at rates closely resembling their respective involvement in the types of serious crimes most likely to elicit the use of force by police. And indeed, that is exactly what the evidence shows.

How about the rate at which officers killed suspects of other racial or ethnic backgrounds? In 1998, the “black-officer-kills-black-felon” rate was 32 per 100,000 black officers, more than double the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed black felons (14 per 100,000). That same year, the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed white or Hispanic felons (28 per 100,000) was much higher than the “black-officer-kills-white-or-Hispanic-felon” rate of 11 per 100,000.

In 1999, criminologists Geoffrey Alpert and Roger Dunham confirmed once again that police officers were more likely to use force against suspects of their own racial group, than against suspects from another racial group.
Click to expand...
NY-BM093_NYFRIS_G_20120213185102.jpg
aclu-stop-frisk-report-2015.jpg
 
Its not wrong its just retarded is all
Black lives matter......as much as other peoples
The last part is left out as it isnt catchy but you have to be a little bit dimple if you didnt get thats what it was implying.
 
whougonnacall said:
Its not wrong its just retarded is all
Black lives matter......as much as other peoples
The last part is left out as it isnt catchy but you have to be a little bit dimple if you didnt get thats what it was implying.
Click to expand...

It is either a claim that black lives matter, uniquely. Or it is an assuming that people have to be told that black lives matter.
It's insulting and infantile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,899
Messages
55,524,775
Members
174,809
Latest member
BackagainBert

Share this page

Back
Top