Why is Gilbert Burns so highly regarded in here?

[jjjjjjjjjjohnny]

he's a good fighter - too much credit for the woodley decimation.

 

[Arrrrgh]

Tbh I don't really see it either... Hes not very interesting, and has definitely peaked.

Oh I got Khamzat winning that fight.
I don't know if Giblert has peaked but Khamzat has something special.
TS's argument was just hogwash to put down other fighters to try and diminish Burns. The irony of saying "he isn't good, who has he beat" when he's beaten good fighters and the other guy is the one with a suspect record. That said, based on how they fight and what has happened in the cage, yeah I think Khamzat wins. I just like logic. We are missing it in the world. This whole thread was a logical fallacy.

 

[legcramp]

Imagine coming back to this thread when the OP picked Khamzat to win who is going to be a huge favorite lol

Come back to me tomorrow morning breh when the sky is blue.

 

[dipstickjimmy]

It’s not like his career at LW was any better hahahahahah

You still haven't answered the question.
Funny but if you are trashing Burns then even if Khamzat beats him he has still never beat anyone. Burns may not have all UFC champs on his hit list but it is still better than Khamzat's to this point.

 

[Cowboy Kurt Angle]

Don’t worry sherdog will turn on him if he loses always happens

 

[mjfan23]

He’s hyped cause: He punched usman in the face that one time and laid and prayed his way to a win over a geriatric karate boy!

 

[Platinum]

You still haven't answered the question.
Funny but if you are trashing Burns then even if Khamzat beats him he has still never beat anyone. Burns may not have all UFC champs on his hit list but it is still better than Khamzat's to this point.

No need to argue with an idiot

 

[Deleted member 110072]

The UFC should focus on his brother George....

 

[dipstickjimmy]

No need to argue with an idiot

Idiot? That’s a bit harsh. You seem more like a Jackass then an idiot to me but if you want to go with Idiot the OK.