- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Messages
- 29,162
- Reaction score
- 17,922
They are trying to beat their opponent. Not kill them.
Why not just use EFO? How can you lose a fight if the other guy can barely touch you?
I have wondered the same thing. I've known how deadly it is since Star Trek.
You got one out of three complete sentences, Einstein.The replies in this thread need more punctuation. Not sure if they are written by children or retards. Or retarded children.
In fact Star Trek employed the chop all the time and every character who used it was very effective. One chop knockouts every time.That's a wrap, son!
Einstein? The name is Mike Danton.You got one out of three complete sentences, Einstein.
I think you'd be surprised. There are some ruthless fighters out there. Look at Palhares. And imagine having the power of someone like Carwin. Man it must feel good to have that power and beat someones face in.They are trying to beat their opponent. Not kill them.
The only useful karate chop is to the throat. That's deadly force. Of course it's illegal in MMA.Might be illegal
I'm think this would be especially effective for ground and pound. It'd be so easy to land even from the bottom position. It doesn't require any wind up and comes at a difficult angle to defend.
At 35 seconds:
At 50 seconds:
In the ufc :
Why not just use EFO? How can you lose a fight if the other guy can barely touch you?