Why don't femenists call out the UFC & Ronda for promoting violence against women?

T

toagrodyf

Yellow Belt
@Yellow
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
Question: Why don't feminists call out the UFC & Ronda for promoting violence against women? Actually, bloody bone breaking violence.

Logical question. It would seem to be quite hypocritical.

How do you feminists rationalize this? Putting a bloody bone breaking beating on a women goes against everything taught by feminism. Sport has nothing to do with it. It is a fundamental mantra of feminism and today's society.
 
Feminism is about male-shaming. Women hurting women is fine amongst feminists since no men are involved.
 
Addressing feminists on Sherdog is like addressing fit, muscular ComiCon patrons
 
For the same reason feminists never called out Leila Ali for violence against women, albeit on a much smaller scale than Rousey.
 
because they don't have men beating up women, and the women are there by choice.
 
RTLv2 said:
Feminism is about male-shaming. Women hurting women is fine amongst feminists since no men are involved.
Click to expand...

Another thread finished by the very first response.

Well done, sir.
 
Don't think 2 willing competitors is a concern for anyone, including feminist.
 
toagrodyf said:
It is a fundamental mantra of feminism and today's society.
Click to expand...

LOL, this is so stupid you would think this is a troll job. But sadly, it's got that hint of juvenileness that makes me think it's not trolling, just being stupid.

I'm going to waste my time and try to teach you something.

Feminism would be PRO women on women violence because it shows women being equals with men, being able to use strength to fight and compete.

Just like feminism is PRO women having a ton of casual sex if they want to. Because they can be just as horny and unrestrained to seek sexual pleasure as men since women are equals to men.
 
toagrodyf said:
Question: Why don't feminists call out the UFC & Ronda for promoting violence against women? Actually, bloody bone breaking violence.

Logical question. It would seem to be quite hypocritical.

How do you feminists rationalize this? Putting a bloody bone breaking beating on a women goes against everything taught by feminism. Sport has nothing to do with it. It is a fundamental mantra of feminism and today's society.
Click to expand...

Because it's a sport they choose to compete in against other women, not a spouse or boyfriend who beats them up or a stranger who rapes them, you moron.
 
TS is a moron. Really, dumb as a sack of hammers. Read up on a subject before you post again you dolt.
 
RTLv2 said:
Feminism is about male-shaming. Women hurting women is fine amongst feminists since no men are involved.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Society says men that strike women are pigs who need to be taught a lesson by the law or violently by someone else. That is the majority stance, especially by women. "A man should never hit a woman"! Right?

What if the women attacks you first and you are trying to neutralize the attack or defend yourself?

What if a small 110lb anorexic male sucker punches at 250lb musclebound male in the square in the face?... Does he not have socially acceptable & legal right to smash the much smaller guy attacking him in the name of self defense?...

Why is this different for the 250lb guy vs a 100?/135?/145?/160lb?... woman?... Isn't this 'one human hitting/assaulting another human'... and should it not be morally acceptable able by society to defend yourself when being attacked by another human?
 
Because feminists would be upset if women weren't allowed to beat each other up when men are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,073
Messages
55,465,733
Members
174,785
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top