- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
- Messages
- 57,520
- Reaction score
- 25,155
Feminism is about male-shaming. Women hurting women is fine amongst feminists since no men are involved.
This.
Feminism is about male-shaming. Women hurting women is fine amongst feminists since no men are involved.
Society says men that strike women are pigs who need to be taught a lesson by the law or violently by someone else. That is the majority stance, especially by women. "A man should never hit a woman"! Right?
What if the women attacks you first and you are trying to neutralize the attack or defend yourself?
What if a small 110lb anorexic male sucker punches at 250lb musclebound male in the square in the face?... Does he not have socially acceptable & legal right to smash the much smaller guy attacking him in the name of self defense?...
Why is this different for the 250lb guy vs a 100?/135?/145?/160lb?... woman?... Isn't this 'one human hitting/assaulting another human'... and should it not be morally acceptable able by society to defend yourself when being attacked by another human?
Sport has nothing to do with it.
grow up guys, domestic abuse is horrifying.
Drown yourself in a five gallon bucket and do us all a favor. Please.
Yes, I agree. Like when a women is verbally and mentally abusive to a man and pushes/slaps/strike him first knowing society tells him over and over and over a man should never hit a women.
Why isn't society saying "a women should never hit a man" too??? It is illegal for them to do so. In fact it, is illegal for woman to hit men just like it for men to hit women. Legally it is only condoned in self defense for both.
Most woman, many men, and most all feminists don't see it this way. They are not standing for equal treatment socially for both women and men. They law says domestic abuse violence is a 2way street. Both sexes do it to the other. Domestic abuse is unequivocally a woman on man violence thing too. The incidence is not that much different between the two... but men rarely, almost if ever, report it. A MUCH HIGHER percentage of woman on male abuse violists do not report the violence for fear of being laughed at and shamed by a very hypocritical society.
Why aren't feminist also drawing attenuation the "beneficial inequalities" they have over men and promotion REAL EQUALITY FOR ALL. It's conveniently inconvenient to do that though... right?
Haha... Why? What's you're valid argument to my points. You must not be able to find any as shown by your insult in lieu of any intelligent logic.
When people are talking about "violence against women" they are talking about men hitting women, not women competing against other women in martial arts competitions.Question: Why don't feminists call out the UFC & Ronda for promoting violence against women? Actually, bloody bone breaking violence.
Logical question. It would seem to be quite hypocritical.
How do you feminists rationalize this? Putting a bloody bone breaking beating on a women goes against everything taught by feminism. Sport has nothing to do with it. It is a fundamental mantra of feminism and today's society.
Question: Why don't feminists call out the UFC & Ronda for promoting violence against women? Actually, bloody bone breaking violence.
Logical question. It would seem to be quite hypocritical.
How do you feminists rationalize this? Putting a bloody bone breaking beating on a women goes against everything taught by feminism. Sport has nothing to do with it. It is a fundamental mantra of feminism and today's society.
Society says men that strike women are pigs who need to be taught a lesson by the law or violently by someone else. That is the majority stance, especially by women. "A man should never hit a woman"! Right?
What if the women attacks you first and you are trying to neutralize the attack or defend yourself?
What if a small 110lb anorexic male sucker punches at 250lb musclebound male in the square in the face?... Does he not have socially acceptable & legal right to smash the much smaller guy attacking him in the name of self defense?...
Why is this different for the 250lb guy vs a 100?/135?/145?/160lb?... woman?... Isn't this 'one human hitting/assaulting another human'... and should it not be morally acceptable able by society to defend yourself when being attacked by another human?
Society says men that strike women are pigs who need to be taught a lesson by the law or violently by someone else. That is the majority stance, especially by women. "A man should never hit a woman"! Right?
What if the women attacks you first and you are trying to neutralize the attack or defend yourself?
What if a small 110lb anorexic male sucker punches at 250lb musclebound male in the square in the face?... Does he not have socially acceptable & legal right to smash the much smaller guy attacking him in the name of self defense?...
Why is this different for the 250lb guy vs a 100?/135?/145?/160lb?... woman?... Isn't this 'one human hitting/assaulting another human'... and should it not be morally acceptable able by society to defend yourself when being attacked by another human?
Because feminists are hypocrites. There is not one feminist who like to see the men fight because violence etc. but when wmma happened they call it empowerment. Their goal is female superiority even if they deny it their actions still lead to this.
How many feminists do you even know? I know a fuck ton and I've gotten a considerable amount of them involved in martial arts. (I never shut the fuck up about BJJ) because being able to protect themselves without relying on a man is important to them.
Also the most radical feminist I've ever met got really into watching MMA. Which sort of contradicts the "not one" statement.
This is completely the opposite of my experiences, but okay. In my muay thai club there are no feminists.