- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 11,912
- Reaction score
- 10,606
Tyson is not the sharpest tool in the shed.
You would be surprised...
Tyson is not the sharpest tool in the shed.
He was more of a blunt hitter, though his body shots were at pretty sharp anglesTyson is not the sharpest tool in the shed.
HahahahahahahAYTHH THECONDTH, MY FATHTETHT KNOCKOUT.
BS. Tyson was extremely technical in his prime, maybe the most technical out of anyone.Tyson was not the most technical boxer out there. He used his raw power to beat a lot of his opponents. Plus once people had seen what he could do, it genuinely put fear into them. He had a lot of guys beat before they even stepped into the ring. I would honestly go with someone else, for boxing anyway. Now if you wanna be batshit crazy, then Tyson is your guy.
As long as they don't spar him. Mma is full of glass jaws. Imagine Tyson hitting them.
He was a little more technical coming up, but then declined on that department and went almost only for pure power like you say.Tyson was not the most technical boxer out there. He used his raw power to beat a lot of his opponents. Plus once people had seen what he could do, it genuinely put fear into them. He had a lot of guys beat before they even stepped into the ring. I would honestly go with someone else, for boxing anyway. Now if you wanna be batshit crazy, then Tyson is your guy.
Came here to say this.being a good fighter at one point in your life doesn't mean you would make a good coach.
The fact you think Conor McGregor should adopt the peek-a-boo style used by Mike Tyson and Floyd Patterson shows you know jack shit about boxing. Never post here again.I'd love to see his boxing style in MMA. I could picture a guy like Hector Lombard improving immensely.
Maybe Conor too? Conor could probably afford it.
Probably worried he might rape them