- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 638
- Reaction score
- 0
I saw The Hobbit as soon as it came out and I enjoyed it immensely. I had read about it being filmed at 48 fps and I really had no idea what this would do, when the film first came on I couldn't put my finger on it but something was off, then I realised that it looked like a soap opera or a drama or sort of a documentary or news broadcast.
I think 48 fps added to some scenes like when the history of Erebal was shown, it gave it this look that made all the fantasy elements look real. However some scenes like when Frodo is talking to Bilbo looks really strange.
What I can say is I'm glad that there is a version in 24 fps as well, I think in general 24 fps is better suited but 48 fps is a great experience in itself.
Can someone explain to me why 48 fps looks like a soap opera or why soap operas look the way they do?
I think 48 fps added to some scenes like when the history of Erebal was shown, it gave it this look that made all the fantasy elements look real. However some scenes like when Frodo is talking to Bilbo looks really strange.
What I can say is I'm glad that there is a version in 24 fps as well, I think in general 24 fps is better suited but 48 fps is a great experience in itself.
Can someone explain to me why 48 fps looks like a soap opera or why soap operas look the way they do?