- Joined
- Jul 28, 2006
- Messages
- 2,070
- Reaction score
- 333
Glad to see Chael in a gi. More MMA pro's should do the same!
He did the move right. He just underestimated Fedors core strength Chael WAS NOT moving that monster
Because there's this retarded mindset in most bjj schools that if you're not in a gi, it's not BJJ. Thus they refuse to rank you, no matter how bad you crush their black belts in no-gi. Hell, I remember when Jon Jones was a white belt in one pic and his trainer said as much.
10th Planet is 100% no gi, and founded by a Machado black belt. Is that not BJJ? Gordon Ryan doesn't train in a gi, but is a Danaher (and thus Renzo Gracie) black belt. Sub grappling is sub grappling, and fixating on the gi is only going to hinder practitioners.I dunno seems like it would be hard to move someone with that.
Well it's not.
If I can beat up a karate black belt that doesn't make me a karate black belt.
And what belt are you?Yeah. And Conor even made the joke himself “I got my brown belt and I didn’t even grapple!”
Conor isn’t a brown belt imo. And belts are meaningless when they’re handed out like candy.
How come guys like Rashad and Chael have black belts, and even Conor has a brown belt, but they clearly suck at jui-jitsu? Or at least you never see them throwing arm bars or anything.
I have a feeling the coaches just level guys up due to time being put in, but that's stupid, because time doesn't always equal leveling up.
Black belt means nothing these days. It should mean you're dangerous like Nick Diaz on the ground or FFS you should at least be able to throw some Fedor style arm bars.
And what belt are you?
It's pretty obvious that you haven't got a clue about what you're talking about.
If they did it the way it's suppose to happen stupid students would start complaining and say I pay so much money to train here and been here so long and I don't have a decent belt
And that's the sort of thing that tilts me so bad, when people think they're qualified because of time spent. Time spent doesn't matter if you still aren't capable. Just like a Ferrari and a Mazda can both accelerate for 5 seconds but the Ferrari will be father in the end. People are such pussies for putting people's feelings ahead of logic. You see it everywhere. It's pathetic.
10th Planet is 100% no gi, and founded by a Machado black belt. Is that not BJJ? Gordon Ryan doesn't train in a gi, but is a Danaher (and thus Renzo Gracie) black belt. Sub grappling is sub grappling, and fixating on the gi is only going to hinder practitioners.
There are massive differences between judo, especially as it's practiced today, and BJJ. The only difference i'm talking about is whether or not you wear a gi.And BJJ started from judo, so is it not judo?
It's not like a BJJ black belt is required to be a great grappler, it's just an art that can make you one. But if you don't know that art and don't use a fundamental aspect of it it's fair to say you aren't a master or say black belt in it.
There are massive differences between judo, especially as it's practiced today, and BJJ. The only difference i'm talking about is whether or not you wear a gi.
There's differences for sure, but easily 99% or better of the techniques work with or without the gi, maybe with slight modifications (grab the wrist instead of sleeve, collar vs head/neck, etc). To say it's no longer BJJ because there's no gi is asinine. And then there's the contradiction that nearly all schools train no-gi at least once a week, but then the hardcore traditionalists want to claim that's not BJJ? Wtf is it then, and why are they incorporating it if they refuse to claim it as such?And that leads to massive differences.
The Gi changes the game, some parts are similar, some parts the same but there are which are completely different.
For instance my favourite nogi guard pass gets me collar choked whenever I am in a gi.
There's differences for sure, but easily 99% or better of the techniques work with or without the gi, maybe with slight modifications (grab the wrist instead of sleeve, collar vs head/neck, etc). To say it's no longer BJJ because there's no gi is asinine. And then there's the contradiction that nearly all schools train no-gi at least once a week, but then the hardcore traditionalists want to claim that's not BJJ? Wtf is it then, and why are they incorporating it if they refuse to claim it as such?
Lmao, I primarily do no gi now, but I did my first 3 years in a gi almost exclusively. Still do gi once every few weeks. Whatever though, we'll agree to disagree.If you think it's 99% the same I suggest you actually try them both before making that claim again.
We are done here.