Sure, but what percentage of those improved outcomes are due to factors other than healthcare access? Also, Hve those countries with better health outcomes promoted harmful nutritional guidelines for decades (e.g. the FDA approved/promoted food pyramid)?
The FDA's phony nutrition science: How Big Food and Agriculture trumps real science -- and why the government allows it
https://www.salon.com/2015/04/12/th...eal_science_and_why_the_government_allows_it/
Do those countries also promote sedentary lifestyles for our children and consumption of processed foods (e.g. several hours per day in a classroom and school lunches lacking proper nutrition)?
Results from the United States of America's 2016 Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth
" Overall physical activity received a grade of D- due to the low prevalence of meeting physical activity guidelines. A grade of D was assigned to health-related fitness, reflecting the low prevalence of meeting cardiorespiratory fitness standards."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562149/
The State of School Lunches In America
"A 2009
investigation by
USA Today found that meat served in U.S. schools wouldn’t meet the quality or safety standards of fast-food restaurants. And according to the book
Lunch Lessons, almost half the vegetables eaten by most children aged 2 to 19 in the U.S. were French fries."
https://foodrevolution.org/blog/school-lunch-in-america/
These factors (and others which relate to US health outcomes) are directly related to our political leadership and governmental interference in the US, so it is important to understand any aversion to imparting MORE responsibilities onto this same leadership (both political and scientific).