Okay, but overall still pretty high suicide rates for supposedly the happiest places. I think like with a lot of social studies there's a lot to be questioned, like how the fuck do you quantify happiness and from what I read of the study, it's just pretty loose correlations between certain aspects that improve overall life and the assumption it will make you happy. Which
may indicate an agenda past the posited research question or maybe just a poorly formulated title. Like
@Cole train said there seems to be a real loneliness problem in Finland, which I think we can all agree is not a sign of happiness, but somehow this seemed to have slipped the defining criteria in the study. But like the memes suggest, shouldn't have been that hard to notice if they put real effort into finding out how happy people are, if looked through a broad scope.
I know that when I was in Finland I was astonished at the sheer amount of alcoholics everywhere. Didn't give me a very happy impression.
I mean there are a lot of people defending Scandinavia, which is fine on it's own, and basically every other Scandinavian country does seem a lot happier in general than Finland, to me. And it's also fair to point out that many people just have very superficial, or even inaccurate, knowledge of those countries. But that all doesn't really prove anything about how they actually stack up to other countries when purely discussing happiness. Which is also a very hard thing to do, because who does have intimate and accurate knowledge of basically all countries and their inhabitants? Probably nobody. But it's still the point of the discussion. It is a comparative statement to say they are the happiest. So you have to compare, not just bitch about people not knowing this or that.