Why Are Fighters Required to do “Fighter Meetings” With DC and Anik?

Gabe

Saturdays are for the Boys
@Silver
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
12,293
Reaction score
5,815
This has gotta be one of the stupidest mandatory things that the UFC makes these guys do. They’re not even for press or our entertainment it has to be behind closed doors. You don’t think the fans would like to see these groundbreaking meetings that Anik is always talking about? It seems like just a way for the commentators to pester the fighter and ask pointless questions just to have some material.
 
The meetings happen so that the commentators have things to say during the PPV when that fighter is walking out. When you hear DC or Anik say something like "X fighter went to colorado to train at elevation for this fight" that info probably came from the meeting
 
It's so the commentators have something to talk about, people complain that they dont get any promotion but the fighter meetings are where they can speak a bit about themselves and give the fans the opportunity to know the fighters on a more personal level.

basically, Promotion
 
Yeah it's for the commentators. Of course i would hide personal struggles from them like break ups, divorces, family issues if that's possible. Anik can't be trusted with.

It's a whatever you say can and will be used kind of thing.
 
Last edited:
Seems to me that a bit of preparation for the commentary would be a ... good thing?

Depends. You have Anik-bot who'll remember every single detail and being them up whenever, and then there's Cormier who'll forget everything including how to pronounce your name.
 
Same as every other league, it's an old dumb tradition. Watch the nfl ones they are so dumb. No one ever says anything interesting.
 
This has gotta be one of the stupidest mandatory things that the UFC makes these guys do. They’re not even for press or our entertainment it has to be behind closed doors. You don’t think the fans would like to see these groundbreaking meetings that Anik is always talking about? It seems like just a way for the commentators to pester the fighter and ask pointless questions just to have some material.
To give them stuff to talk about.

It's really not a big deal.
 
from a spectator perspective i'm happy they do.
I have no idea how long they've been doing the pre-fight interviews but in addition to giving commentary talking points and personal details to discuss during the telecast they also offer an opportunity to vet the fighters.
For instance, Diego and Josh Fabia were preparing to create a situation where the UFC could have found themselves in a courtroom after they disclosed conditions that showed Diego was unfit to fight based on their own complaint of injury
Caleb Starnes showed up to a fight and basically sprinted around refusing to engage which is bad for business. Speaking to him ahead of the match may have uncovered a mental issue making him unfit to fight.
Pre-fight interviews offer another layer of security to see where the fighters head is at.
 
Back
Top