- Joined
- May 12, 2018
- Messages
- 19,865
- Reaction score
- 28,696
No he shouldnt. He didnt hold any belts simultaneously.BJ should have mention as well.
JUST SO YOU KNOW IN THE OP I SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED SIMULTANEOUS BELT HOLDERS ONLYIf I could use emojis right now, you would be looking at that middle finger from the wrasslin selection
JUST SO YOU KNOW
I left it out because it didnt have anything to do with the title itself. Believe me im not trying to cover for him or anything.You forget the part where he was tapped out in between. Kinda hard to credit someone as a champ champ when they just held the first belt for him while going 1-1 with Nate to get an instant shot at Eddie .
He was the first one allowed to do it . The Champ Champ concept was around long before Conor.Conor by far.
He was the one bold enough to be the first to try it in UFC. nobody would have attempted it if he didn't do it first.
he's the Inaugural 'Strip Strip ' ChampionConor should be disqualified from this conversation for being to much of a duck & pussy to ever defend any of his belts
View attachment 1047049
^^^^ the only belts he ever defended^^^
![]()
Trolls and morons.Conor Mcgregor never tried to defend either of them...Not sure how he got votes, lost a fight in between title fights, for anyone else that would have meant going back to defend the original belt.
Sure, guyConor by far.
He was the one bold enough to be the first to try it in UFC. nobody would have attempted it if he didn't do it first.
Yes but it has everything to do with whos the best champ champ. Definitely not the guy that lost inbetween. Not very simultaneousI left it out because it didnt have anything to do with the title itself. Believe me im not trying to cover for him or anything.