Why don’t these two fight and the winner gets a title shot. Crazy idea I know
If Whittaker is smart he will allow Vettori to fight Adesanya first since Marvin is going to spam Izzy with TD attempts.
Adesanya is expecting these TD attempts so if Rob waits it out he can watch Adesanya prevail and see what did and did not work or he can watch Vettori prevail and fight against a guy who he almost surely believes he is significant better than and would be an easier fight for him.
If he loses to Izzy again he may have to switch divisions, so letting Marvin go first significantly decreases the risk to him.
If Whittaker is smart he will allow Vettori to fight Adesanya first since Marvin is going to spam Izzy with TD attempts.
Adesanya is expecting these TD attempts so if Rob waits it out he can watch Adesanya prevail and see what did and did not work or he can watch Vettori prevail and fight against a guy who he almost surely believes he is significant better than and would be an easier fight for him.
If he loses to Izzy again he may have to switch divisions, so letting Marvin go first significantly decreases the risk to him.
then what does Robert do in the meantime then? Sit out till December?
Seems like a lot of wasted time, he’s no spring chicken he should have 4 months off not 6, counting in 2 months of camp that’s 6 and 8He said in an interview prior to the Gastelum fight he will likely only fight twice this year due to how late in the year this fight was scheduled for, so I don't think he would mind.
The only other fighters in the top 10 he has not beaten are Costa, Vettori, and Hermansson.
There is no incentive to him fighting Vettori considering they are the only two at the moment with real title shot claims.
Fighting Hermansson is not worth the risk nor is fighting Costa; there is no reward. Just sit and wait till December if that's how long it takes so be it.
But he’s beaten everyone they threw at himWhittaker. Vetori hasn't beaten any top 4 MWs.
But he’s beaten everyone they threw at him
But then people would argue Marvin had a closer fight w the champ.So has Whittaker since he lost the title, and his wins are overall against better competition.
But then people would argue Marvin had a closer fight w the champ.
Jack HermanssonVetori hasn't beaten any top 4 MWs.
Even as Vettori fan, i also ever find fair give former Champ a chance of take his throne back
Would be still ok if they chose Whittaker, and Marvin does his cancelled fight with Till with guaranteed title shot in case of win
Of course i would prefer Vettori-Izzy 2 though, he also did better than Whittaker in the first fight and i think he have more decent chance
Jack Hermansson
10/01/2020 #4 Middleweight 21-5-0
Best answer yet. Kudos.Whittaker deserves it more, although I understand the logic behind those who say Vettori. Vettori hasn't fought Izzy in a longer time, plus it was a split decision - a much closer fight than the one sided fight Izzy vs Rob was. But looking at who each guy has beaten, plus their current streaks, it would be insane to say Vettori deserves it over Whittaker. Rob has simply beaten much more solid competition, and he has looked far more impressive when he has done so.