- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 35,004
- Reaction score
- 18,354
All of them.
I’m going to respectfully disagree. Firstly, it keeps people with substance abuse issues who need help and treatment from being criminalized, and further disconnected from society. It’s very difficult to fully rehabilitate someone when they can’t get a job because they’re a convicted felon, or are stigmatized as a criminal or lowlife.Making these things legal doesn't help anything sir.
I’m going to respectfully disagree. Firstly, it keeps people with substance abuse issues who need help and treatment from being criminalized, and further disconnected from society. It’s very difficult to fully rehabilitate someone when they can’t get a job because they’re a convicted felon, or are stigmatized as a criminal or lowlife.
Secondly, legalizing drugs also allows them to be regulated, not cut with all manner of terrible shit.
There are places in Europe that have supervised drug consumption rooms where addicts can inject drugs with sterile equipment under medical supervision for harm reduction, and then typically counseling and job placement services are provided as well. These have been pretty successful.
Portugal is probably the best known success story. They handled their opioid epidemic by decriminalizing basically all drugs, and then took the money they would’ve spent on the needless “war on drugs” and spent that on treatment, mental health services, helping recovering addicts learn skills and trades, job placement, and reconnecting addicts with loved ones. They saw a massive reduction in heroin use, and about a 90% reduction in HIV spread by needles. They now have about 1/50th the mortality rate that we have in the US.
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/10/portugal-opioid#:~:text=According to a New York,fiftieth of the United States'.
So if they made aspirin illegal and you go and take it for a headache you are weak, stupid, and immoral?
I didn’t say anything about it being a disease. One doesn’t have to subscribe to the disease model to see value in harm reduction, counseling, mental health services, or job placement.I was a drug addict for 15 years, and I don't think its a disease, its a choice.
I made the choice and I suffered the consequences.
This doesn't help, and it won't make people get help sir.
I didn’t say anything about it being a disease. One doesn’t have to subscribe to the disease model to see value in harm reduction, counseling, mental health services, or job placement.
And what I laid out does help, it’s been proven to help. It may not “make” anyone get treatment, but building relationships and treating addicts like people, rather than stigmatizing or criminalizing them, at least allows for the opportunity for successful rehabilitation.
But you’re entitled to your opinion, so that is fine.
I did live like that. I was an addict too, not as long as you were, but for close to 10 years. After I overcame my addictions,I took some specialized education courses and got involved in substance abuse treatment by working at a treatment center. So I know what it’s like to be an addict, I know what it takes to overcome an addiction, and I also know what it takes to help others do the same in a residential treatment center setting, which I did for several years. I know what you mean when you say someone who hasn’t lived it is out of their depth discussing it, or wouldn’t truly understand it—but that wouldn’t be the case with me.When you're a drug addict, you to do illegal things sir, and no amount of friendship will stop that...I know from personal experience.
I understand what you're saying but unless you lived like that you're kinda out of your depth.
I made the choice to get clean on my own, no amount of help really helped me.
If anything it enabled me is what Im getting at.
No hate towards you, you know that brother.
I think my thoughts on the matter are more than opinion.
I did live like that. I was an addict too, not as long as you were, but for close to 10 years. After I overcame my addictions,I took some specialized education courses and got involved in substance abuse treatment by working at a treatment center. So I know what it’s like to be an addict, I know what it takes to overcome an addiction, and I also know what it takes to help others do the same in a residential treatment center setting, which I did for several years. I know what you mean when you say someone who hasn’t lived it is out of their depth discussing it, or wouldn’t truly understand it—but that wouldn’t be the case with me.
I only occasionally mention working in the field of substance abuse treatment, and even more rarely mention my own past issues. Partially because of the stigma that addicts face, but mostly because it just isn’t anyone’s business.
I read something about Portugal regarding mixed results. They are getting burnt out. It's a drug entry point to EU so it is going to be flooded with drugs. I thought they had a giant program but it's like 350 people in treatment now. Funding is cut short and it's mostly handled by NGOs now. It's not really about treating people now. They got rid of all those job placement programs. It's about the right to be an addict. They will give you a safe place to get high.I’m going to respectfully disagree. Firstly, it keeps people with substance abuse issues who need help and treatment from being criminalized, and further disconnected from society. It’s very difficult to fully rehabilitate someone when they can’t get a job because they’re a convicted felon, or are stigmatized as a criminal or lowlife.
Secondly, legalizing drugs also allows them to be regulated, not cut with all manner of terrible shit.
There are places in Europe that have supervised drug consumption rooms where addicts can inject drugs with sterile equipment under medical supervision for harm reduction, and then typically counseling and job placement services are provided as well. These have been pretty successful.
Portugal is probably the best known success story. They handled their opioid epidemic by decriminalizing basically all drugs, and then took the money they would’ve spent on the needless “war on drugs” and spent that on treatment, mental health services, helping recovering addicts learn skills and trades, job placement, and reconnecting addicts with loved ones. They saw a massive reduction in heroin use, and about a 90% reduction in HIV spread by needles. They now have about 1/50th the mortality rate that we have in the US.
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/10/portugal-opioid#:~:text=According to a New York,fiftieth of the United States'.
Ban them all.I believe Marijuana is pretty much legal now in many places. So I'd say MDMA. Would love cocaine, but I think it's too intense for people.
Feel free to suggest what drugs.
Fentanyl.
It's the only way to clean up our streets.