- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 4,168
- Reaction score
- 3,616
I'm not sure how anyone could think Bisping was better than Franklin. Franklin is pretty much just a better version of Bisping. Technically sound, bigger, hits harder, good cardio, has passable grappling/wrestling for a striker.
Bisping's only advantage is probably stamina, but Franklin has no problems fighting high pace fights.
In terms of resume, Franklin has beaten better names closer to their primes and was in closer fights with other great fighters (Hendo the main one).
Bisping never really beat anyone great outside of Rockhold. His next big wins were wars against Henderson and Silva who of course were past their primes - both those guys would have beaten Bisping relatively easy if they were younger (Henderson already did).
Rich Franklin was much closer to Dan Henderson's level than Michael Bisping was.
Mousasi and Jacare are probably better fighters also - it's kind of weak just to automatically assume they were lower because they never had the UFC championship. A lot of that has to do with booking and those guys also spent more time outside of the UFC than Michael did. Conceptually speaking Jacare/Mousasi seem like better fighter than Bisping when analyzeing their strengths and weaknesses, and Mousasi/Jacare have beaten more top fighters - so the argument that Bisping should be ranked over them because he was the MW champion at one point is a bit flimsy.
Bisping's only advantage is probably stamina, but Franklin has no problems fighting high pace fights.
In terms of resume, Franklin has beaten better names closer to their primes and was in closer fights with other great fighters (Hendo the main one).
Bisping never really beat anyone great outside of Rockhold. His next big wins were wars against Henderson and Silva who of course were past their primes - both those guys would have beaten Bisping relatively easy if they were younger (Henderson already did).
Rich Franklin was much closer to Dan Henderson's level than Michael Bisping was.
Mousasi and Jacare are probably better fighters also - it's kind of weak just to automatically assume they were lower because they never had the UFC championship. A lot of that has to do with booking and those guys also spent more time outside of the UFC than Michael did. Conceptually speaking Jacare/Mousasi seem like better fighter than Bisping when analyzeing their strengths and weaknesses, and Mousasi/Jacare have beaten more top fighters - so the argument that Bisping should be ranked over them because he was the MW champion at one point is a bit flimsy.