When GSP beat Hendricks :

And yet you trash me in a thread without @ my screen name. Cowardly move along with a few other posters you trashed in a chicken shit way.



Like I told you already..



Then you can attempt to sit on some moral high ground..

Oh, I don't know how to use this @ thing.
I'm not some couch-bound internet addict. I have a very active outdoors life.


The high moral ground is easy to nail: it's the one opposite to GSP fangirls.
 
You just used his image with a gruesome injury as a prop for a cheap insult.

All I did was to point out to how common these injuries are. It is not a putdown,
an insult or a form of disrespect.

You are disrespectful to GSP if you try to victimise him all the time for having
overcome these procedures. It is insulting to him, to the doctors who operated
him, to his physical therapist - it is insulting. You are the one insulting your own
hero, not me.

I am simply saying: those injuries are common. Recovering from them is also
common. It's no credit coming back from them. It is part of the job. To make
a bit deal out of it like you do is an insult.
Recovering from injuries requiring surgery, particularly surgery taking up to 8 hours, as ACL tear repairs do, is a whole other world of difficulty than injuries not requiring such lengthy surgeries. This article suggests a much shorter duration in the case of A. Silva, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/spo...on-silva-faces-long-recovery/article16140715/

In longer surgeries sedation causes muscle atrophy at a very high rate and it's the reason for the long recovery times associated with such injuries. The older you get the harder that is. Common or not, returning at his age and hanging on to your title in the case of the fight with Hendricks (which I deem a draw), and returning after more injuries and surgeries plus the long layoff to finish the champion of a higher weight class, should tell anyone all they need to know about his undeniable superiority as an MMA competitor.

About the OP, it's obviously irrelevant to the question of who came out the worse for wear from the GSP v. Hendricks fight. How did Hendricks do in his next few fights? And GSP?

I don't give a fuck what you and that other guy were arguing about to begin with, but you both sound like a couple of tools.
This thread has shown that gsp fans are out of touch with reality. The majority of the fans of mma have moved on from his paper thin legacy and have taken objective overlooks of his career and realized for the most part that he fought the absolute worst competition out of the goat candidates and couldn't finish any of them or inflict much damage aside from the Fitch fight.
LOL still salty after all these years. Reminds me of a Paul Simon song. And yeah, I'mma gonna hafta get you to ask Sean Sherk and Karo Parisyan and Jake Shields and BJ Penn and Carlos Condit and Thiago Alves and MATT FUCKING HUGHES how they feel about being part of a paper thin legacy and then you go ahead and get back to me, m'kay?
 
Recovering from injuries requiring surgery, particularly surgery taking up to 8 hours, as ACL tear repairs do, is a whole other world of difficulty than injuries not requiring such lengthy surgeries. This article suggests a much shorter duration in the case of A. Silva, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/spo...on-silva-faces-long-recovery/article16140715/

In longer surgeries sedation causes muscle atrophy at a very high rate and it's the reason for the long recovery times associated with such injuries. The older you get the harder that is. Common or not, returning at his age and hanging on to your title in the case of the fight with Hendricks (which I deem a draw), and returning after more injuries and surgeries plus the long layoff to finish the champion of a higher weight class, should tell anyone all they need to know about his undeniable superiority as an MMA competitor.

About the OP, it's obviously irrelevant to the question of who came out the worse for wear from the GSP v. Hendricks fight. How did Hendricks do in his next few fights? And GSP?

I don't give a fuck what you and that other guy were arguing about to begin with, but you both sound like a couple of tools.

LOL still salty after all these years. Reminds me of a Paul Simon song. And yeah, I'mma gonna hafta get you to ask Sean Sherk and Karo Parisyan and Jake Shields and BJ Penn and Carlos Condit and Thiago Alves and MATT FUCKING HUGHES how they feel about being part of a paper thin legacy and then you go ahead and get back to me, m'kay?

Oh my god.

You think you understand what you just wrote.

It is unbelievable.

An ACL reconstruction takes about 3 hours, tops. A nice arthroscopic procedure is a much neater
intervention than dealing with a large fracture.

NO! The muscle atrophy does not come from the time of sedation. The atrophy comes from the
time the limb needs to stay immobilised and protected from sustaining a load. That is why ACL
reconstructions are delicate. It needs a long time for the new ligament to incorporate, and
the recovery time is long.

But not for any of the reasons you wrote.

The crap you just wrote is so wrong, so far from the reality or from understanding this issue
that you are just disqualified to even dream about drawing the very stupid argument of how
much of toughness or whatever it takes to recover from a hangnail.

I am shocked. I haven't run into something so wrong and off the target in a long time.

Hats off. You do not know what you are talking about at a high level.

That is rare.
 
Oh my god.

You think you understand what you just wrote.

It is unbelievable.

An ACL reconstruction takes about 3 hours, tops. A nice arthroscopic procedure is a much neater
intervention than dealing with a large fracture.

NO! The muscle atrophy does not come from the time of sedation. The atrophy comes from the
time the limb needs to stay immobilised and protected from sustaining a load. That is why ACL
reconstructions are delicate. It needs a long time for the new ligament to incorporate, and
the recovery time is long.

But not for any of the reasons you wrote.

The crap you just wrote is so wrong, so far from the reality or from understanding this issue
that you are just disqualified to even dream about drawing the very stupid argument of how
much of toughness or whatever it takes to recover from a hangnail.

I am shocked. I haven't run into something so wrong and off the target in a long time.

Hats off. You do not know what you are talking about at a high level.

That is rare.
<Dany07><YeahOKJen>

I said my piece. Happy holidays.
 
Dude, you're arguing with people who have had every nuance explained a thousand times and DGAF because facts and context and nuance don't matter to them; it's all about the feels. Why feed the trolls?

Dude....
you type rubbish about a topic you do not understand.

You are the troll.
 
Their thought process on the "Hendricks was surely on PEDs" is trivial to explain.

(0) GSP is clean and innocent of any possible irregularity.
(1) They assume GSP is a god-like fighting machine (fanaticism).
(2) If a fighter gave GSP a hard time, he must have been on PEDs or any other similar prohibited means to gain leverage
(3) Hendricks beat GSP, despite the robbery we all saw. Hence, (2) and (1) = Only a guy "juiced to the gills" managed to trouble their untouchable hero.

Corollary: every other great fighter is on PEDs. See (0).
<Waaah>
Cry some more.
 
So Dbreiden doesn't like it when I type his name without an @?


LOL

Lie some more.

You are what people refer to as....ignorant.
LOL

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/spo...-knee-surgery-was-successful/article17913982/

Whatever you think you know about me, MMA, GSP, all wrong, son. Sorry.
giphy.gif
 
Man I give you a lot of.credit. you are like a zombie. Your chin is straight basura but you keep coming back after getting KO'd left and right by every single poster. Your resiliency is comparable to Frankie in those Maynard fights. I give you respect for that.

You are truly mentally challenged.
 
Johnny had a chance to 'prove' he deserved the fight, by winning subsequent fights against top competition, being a dominant champ after GSP the same way GSP himself was before him. Similar to how noone really remembers Silva losing to Ryo Chonan, except as a joke, because he kept winning.

What happened instead though, was one of the most abrupt and dramatic nosedives in competitive success yet seen in UFC history. From fighting for titles to obese bum cut from the promotion in the span of a handful of appearances, shaming all of those who thought themselves fans. From standing on the cusp of world championship, to jobbing to gay pornstars on bush league carny promotions. Him losing after that fight validates the idea that it was right for him to lose that fight too. Victory forgives many sins, while defeat affords few to none.

Noone actually likes Hendricks for Hendricks, he exists simply as a convenient pretext for some, a vehicle through which they may express their spite for some other fighter that they dislike, for one reason or another. That's the sad state of affairs; the most famous Big Rig will ever be remembered, is the day he lost to Georges St. Pierre.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top