- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 31,793
- Reaction score
- 27,658
I've known about Bet-David for a while now, but he's been more on my radar lately because of his interviews with Kyle Kulinski (Justice Democrats, Secular Talk, Krystal Kyle & Friends) and Reza Aslan (professor, author, TV host and producer, NIAC board member). I feel like even though he got smoked intellectually by both of these men who are more informed on sociopolitical issues than he is, I respect his willingness to engage and to keep having long-form interviews like this. It seems like he's going to invite both Kulinski and Aslan back on, which I'm looking forward to because I enjoyed the conversations/debates he had with them.
I can relate to Bet-David on some level because I believe in discipline and hard work and delayed gratification and being entrepreneurial. However, he seems to rely on anecdotes rather than empirical data when it comes to structuring a society, which I think is stupid and counterproductive. We agree on a lot on the individual level, but I don't think you can scale these things at the societal level. There's a reason why the vast majority of economists are Keynesian and not Chicago School or Marxian.
There's a TON of data and real-world examples of Keynesian economics keeping societies intact while there are numerous examples of Marxism being attempted and massively failing. And countries like Haiti where they don't have public schools or building restrictions (rather minarchist in nature) are a lot worse off than similar countries like Jamaica where they have public schools and regulations and are more developed and better organized because of better governance. I believe government plays an important role in society along with business interests and we need to balance these things as best we can.
I can relate to Bet-David on some level because I believe in discipline and hard work and delayed gratification and being entrepreneurial. However, he seems to rely on anecdotes rather than empirical data when it comes to structuring a society, which I think is stupid and counterproductive. We agree on a lot on the individual level, but I don't think you can scale these things at the societal level. There's a reason why the vast majority of economists are Keynesian and not Chicago School or Marxian.
There's a TON of data and real-world examples of Keynesian economics keeping societies intact while there are numerous examples of Marxism being attempted and massively failing. And countries like Haiti where they don't have public schools or building restrictions (rather minarchist in nature) are a lot worse off than similar countries like Jamaica where they have public schools and regulations and are more developed and better organized because of better governance. I believe government plays an important role in society along with business interests and we need to balance these things as best we can.