What is the democratic message?

EZShrimpn said:
I see Jack V. Clinton is still doing his "Anyone who exposes democratic flirting with wall street oligarchs is a seekrit republican" shtick.
Click to expand...

When you vigorously defend Obama's corporatism online it's known as "black knighting".
 
DynamicLoosener said:
Do you believe in the 2nd amendment?
Click to expand...
Well, I assume you mean to ask do I agree with it and sure, I'm totally fine with responsible people owning guns (I like them myself). It's not a big political issue for me at all though.

I am sympathetic to the victims of gun violence in schools.
 
Last edited:
ultramanhyata said:
lol This is weak. Even for you.
Click to expand...

Meh. I think quoting an insanely biased clown who has no credibility at all to make your case (and avoiding the actual question, of course) is weak, even for you. You don't have the knowledge base to support your belief, but you have a strong emotional connection to it so that kind of trolling is all you're left with.
 
Another argument from authority. Man these Clintonistas are not doing well with being booted from the levers of power.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Meh. I think quoting an insanely biased clown who has no credibility at all to make your case (and avoiding the actual question, of course) is weak, even for you. You don't have the knowledge base to support your belief, but you have a strong emotional connection to it so that kind of trolling is all you're left with.
Click to expand...

I think your criticizing Greenwald when I used a random Guardian article to direct a poster to a Frontline episode is really your approach to "honest discourse" in a nutshell.

Sell your bullshit to the newbies who don't yet realize you're a derail troll.
 
ultramanhyata said:
I think your criticizing Greenwald when I used a random Guardian article to direct a poster to a Frontline episode is really your approach to "honest discourse" in a nutshell.
Click to expand...

I think your describing a Greenwald column as "a random Guardian article" while accusing me of dishonesty for calling it a Greenwald column perfectly sums up your approach to honest discourse.

Also, who is the real "derail troll" here, liar? The thread is about the Democratic message, while you're trying to turn it into a platform for spewing Greenwald's usual idiot bile toward the left and your own bile spewing toward posters who bring up facts that you would prefer go unnoticed. Even on the subtopic, who do you think should have been prosecuted who wasn't? Like I said, the gov't can't just go rounding up people to throw in prison because there is populist anger.
 
Last edited:
Jack V Savage said:
I think your describing a Greenwald column as "a random Guardian article" while accusing me of dishonesty for calling it a Greenwald column perfectly sums up your approach to honest discourse.
Click to expand...

Type "PBS Obama Wall Street Guardian" into Google and see the first hit.

I know nothing about Greenwald. I was just looking for a commentary on the Frontline piece that I remembered seeing years ago and that sparked me to view the episode.

I await your apology.
 
Anyway, the democratic message is "If you oppose the Clinton Extended Political Network, you're a Russian."
 
Her institutional capture of the DNC did not end after the election.
 
zebby23 said:
Clinton lost... At some point you HAVE to get over it
Click to expand...

I think you're responding to someone I ignore, but the Clinton hate is stupid--just demonstrating how easily manipulated these guys are. If Bernie had gotten the nomination, he'd be demonized by the same people who spend their days obsessing over Clinton now and to the same extent.

ultramanhyata said:
Type "PBS Obama Wall Street Guardian" into Google and see the first hit.
Click to expand...

You're saying that if I search for Greenwald's column, I'll find it? I guess yay Google.

ultramanhyata said:
I know nothing about Greenwald. I was just looking for a commentary on the Frontline piece that I remembered seeing years ago and that sparked me to view the episode.

I await your apology.
Click to expand...

You want me to apologize for pointing out that you were quoting a Greenwald column and ducking the question, right? You'll have to spell out what transgression you think I committed there.

zebby23 said:
Who do I bring up? lol.

It would be like Democrats constantly bringing up John McCain or Mitt Romney
Click to expand...

That would never happen because Democrats vote based on the platform/party while Republicans vote because they hate the other candidate, and they don't even support their own platform.
 
EZShrimpn said:
Her institutional capture of the DNC did not end after the election.
Click to expand...

You are just so wrong. The only network that talks about Hillary Clinton is Fox News because you guys need an enemy.

Democrats have forgotten about Clinton. I'm wondering if you know this and are playing dumb or just need someone to hate that bad that you can't let her go. She lost... GET OVER IT
 
Jack V Savage said:
I think you're responding to someone I ignore
Click to expand...

ya, ezshrimpin.

I should ignore him too but i haven't gotten to that point yet.
If Dick Cheney ran as a Dem they would figure out a way to make him the most hated man in the world. You are right, republicans are so gullible and easily manipulated it;s hilarious[
 
EZShrimpn said:
I guess we'll see.
Click to expand...

We have already seen. I"M A DEM and the only time I hear about Hillary Clinton is when people like you bring her up. You can't seem to let it go and I can only assume it's because people like Hannity can't seem to let her go.. You guys need a common enemy even if that enemy is make believe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
Elections Dark Money Group Secretly Funding High-Profile Democratic Influencers
2
Replies
20
Views
560
Xanzito
X

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,659
Messages
58,309,200
Members
175,998
Latest member
joshvegas

Share this page

Back
Top