• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

What is a globalist?

Blackened

It is a new era!
Banned
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
12,000
Reaction score
1
OK This will probably (rightfully) get moved to the dump, but I'm just curious. The only person I've heard use this term is Alex Jones. So who the fuck is he talking about? I want specific names.

*also, the term globalist seems to imply people that prefer globes to maps or some shit. Doesn't have the most evil ring to it. I'd have come up with something that sounded cooler:redface:
 
Search for IDL, read his posts. The globalists are the people he ominously refers to.
 
Search for IDL, read his posts. The globalists are the people he ominously refers to.

I've heard people ominously refer to them but I've never had anyone tell me who they are.

By saying "the globalist did it" they are begging the question... "who are the globalists?"

Edit: For example, when we say the jews we have a clear object, people who practice the jewish faith. When we say the muslims same thing. When we say the democrats. When we say blacks, whites, hispanics, americans, mexicans, germans, irish... whatever. But when we say "globalists", I have to ask... who?

I'd just like an answer
 
Last edited:
in b4 IDL

Globalists are basically the network of oligarchs that set global policy and lie at the top of the global power structure.

They aren't nation centric like normal people are. They have much grander ambitions.

You can see a lot of the global direction for example the smart meter grid. I won't get into what the main purpose of that is, but countries all around are implementing it.

Most people don't realize its coordinated across multiple countries. This coordination is achieved by global directive. Who are the directors? The globalists of course.

There are many global entities, like the UN, the bank of international settlements, etc.

An example of a club globalist get together is the Bilderberg group. There are many such clubs though.
 
My definition is.... A globalist is someone who has no nationality, no ties or loyalty to any country or it's citizens. (or to any one in the world for that matter that who isn't in their close circle.)

They put profits over national security, stability, or law.
They don't mind outsourcing entire industries at the cost of their country's middle-class, they don't mind selling something half-done or inferior contracts to the military as long as they make a shit ton of profits, they don't mind having people work in sweatshops, and they don't mind getting a tax credit for making record profits instead of actually contributing to society like the rest of us.
 
in b4 IDL

Globalists are basically the network of oligarchs that set global policy and lie at the top of the global power structure.

They aren't nation centric like normal people are. They have much grander ambitions.

You can see a lot of the global direction for example the smart meter grid. I won't get into what the main purpose of that is, but countries all around are implementing it.


Most people don't realize its coordinated across multiple countries. This coordination is achieved by global directive. Who are the directors? The globalists of course.

There are many global entities, like the UN, the bank of international settlements, etc.

An example of a club globalist get together is the Bilderberg group. There are many such clubs though.

I thought it was just another money racket.

Anyway, back to the point. I understand that, but I want names and what makes them globalist. Surely just because someone landed a job at the UN doesn't make them a globalist?

Is it an ideology? Is it the fact that they have power? What is the definition of "globalist".
 
My definition is.... A globalist is someone who has no nationality, no ties or loyalty to any country or it's citizens. (or to any one in the world for that matter that who isn't in their close circle.)

They put profits over national security, stability, or law.
They don't mind outsourcing entire industries at the cost of their country's middle-class, they don't mind selling something half-done or inferior contracts to the military as long as they make a shit ton of profits, they don't mind having people work in sweatshops, and they don't mind getting a tax credit for making record profits instead of actually contributing to society like the rest of us.

So people with money and poor moral values? Why can't we just say 'the sociopaths'?
 
Last edited:
So people with money and poor moral values? Why can't we just say 'the sociopaths'?

I guess you could call them lots of stuff.

They're not just sociopaths, they are sociopaths with a ton of money and power, with unlimited "get out of jail free" cards courtesy of the Feds.
 
I thought it was just another money racket.

Anyway, back to the point. I understand that, but I want names and what makes them globalist. Surely just because someone landed a job at the UN doesn't make them a globalist?

Is it an ideology? Is it the fact that they have power? What is the definition of "globalist".

If you want some major players I'll throw in the Rothschild's, Rockefellers, duPonts, Morgans, Warburgs..

Clintons and Bush Family are up there.

Much of the groups power comes from controlling the global banking network. And it is a group, as in they do work together. It really does transcend any country.

The power structure goes far higher than the party politics you see on television.

They are united in a common goal, and that is to consolidate as much power as possible, as a group.
 
If you want some major players I'll throw in the Rothschild's, Rockefellers, duPonts, Morgans, Warburgs..

Clintons and Bush Family are up there.

Much of the groups power comes from controlling the global banking network. And it is a group, as in they do work together. It really does transcend any country.

The power structure goes far higher than the party politics you see on television.

Ah, I getcha. I understand it.

I don't watch television :redface:

I do think "globalist" is a poor name for them though. Like I said, I'm sure when the globe was first invented geographers were all "damn globalists and their globes. I miss the good ole days of maps"
 
If they all work together, why did Teddy Roosevelt have such a hard on for Rockefeller?

Why did Vanderbilt and Rockefeller continually try to rape each other(monetarily speaking) in the late 1800's?

Etc etc.
 
A globalist is either somebody who believes that one set of rules for everyone to live by is going to make everything better or a rich person with delusions of grandeur who thinks that freeing up borders in the marketplace will allow them to take over the world. Or it's something concocted by the CT crowd.
 
If they all work together, why did Teddy Roosevelt have such a hard on for Rockefeller?

Why did Vanderbilt and Rockefeller continually try to rape each other(monetarily speaking) in the late 1800's?

Etc etc.

I mean, if you look at the world it's clear "something is fucked up'. Either there is a plan for the people who have power to gain more power or the leaders are incredibly incompetent and immoral

*Edit: When I think Bush, I think incompetent. When I think Obama I think immoral
 
Ah, I getcha. I understand it.

I don't watch television :redface:

I do think "globalist" is a poor name for them though. Like I said, I'm sure when the globe was first invented geographers were all "damn globalists and their globes. I miss the good ole days of maps"

Yeah it's a type of catch all name really. Just means the ones at the very top directing things that affect everyone.

Like the generals of an army, but in this case the generals of the globe.

They aren't talked about on television much in the context of being globalists or what they are really doing. The only way to learn about them really is through books or on the internet.

They prefer to work in private without the public eye on them.

The media (especially the MSM) has been consolidated and incorporated into the global power structure. The heads of the media are part of the club so the various networks are used as way of controlling what people see, and more importantly what people don't see.

So you are better off not watching TV otherwise chances are you are watching propaganda. It's incorporated into television shows and movies as well as the news stations.
 
If they all work together, why did Teddy Roosevelt have such a hard on for Rockefeller?

Why did Vanderbilt and Rockefeller continually try to rape each other(monetarily speaking) in the late 1800's?

Etc etc.

There has been opposition to them throughout history but it's really over the last 50 years or so they have really gotten their grip. I'm sure they still have their quarrels though. I'm not familiar with your examples to comment.

1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve was the beginning of the end for the US.

And now that the media is so controlled, it's home free.

It's a gradual consolidation of power and it seems to be really picking up steam.
 
Like the generals of an army, but in this case the generals of the globe.

I partly agree with you. I dont believe many people would disagree that money is the largest source of power in the world. The part I disagree with, is that they are all on the same side. They arent some hivemind out to dominate the world, or that would have happened back around the original Rockefeller's time.
 
Back
Top