What happens when diversity wins and the minorities are the solid majority?

What is going to happen when minority groups become solid majorities in Western countries?


  • Total voters
    55
I'm sure you think the same about African American studies, etc.

Gender studies are certainly about the pursuit of knowledge, even if in addition to the empowerment of its female students. If you were less defensive and reactionary about how you perceive the world, I believe that you'd find that gender studies, though varying based on what subset you're talking about, can be extraordinarily helpful in understanding the world better and both shaping and informing new understanding as well as strengthening existing understandings.

In my experience, people who are afraid of being wrong or misinformed see nefariousness in education. People who want to learn and who embrace sometimes being ill-informed before learning about something realize how much the first group of people blow.

You have to be one of the worst trolls on Sherdog.
 
You have to be one of the worst trolls on Sherdog.

It's Trotsky. A defense of Marxism in the education system should be expected.

It's the way to utopia, where everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.
 
I'm sure you think the same about African American studies, etc.

Gender studies are certainly about the pursuit of knowledge, even if in addition to the empowerment of its female students. If you were less defensive and reactionary about how you perceive the world, I believe that you'd find that gender studies, though varying based on what subset you're talking about, can be extraordinarily helpful in understanding the world better and both shaping and informing new understanding as well as strengthening existing understandings.

In my experience, people who are afraid of being wrong or misinformed see nefariousness in education. People who want to learn and who embrace sometimes being ill-informed before learning about something realize how much the first group of people blow.
I don't have time for pseudoscience. I'm more interested in real science.

I don't give a shit about relativism or whatever. Where is the electron, what happens when we put energy into a system and what happens when energy leaves a system. Guess what? Doesn't matter how you feel. That's life as it is, not as we'd like it to be.
 
It's Trotsky. A defense of Marxism in the education system should be expected.

It's the way to utopia.
A paradise where we all chop off our penises and women rule the world. And there is constant never ending revolutionary warfare against the "peasants and oppressors".

And people with low IQ outbreed people with high IQ (because they kill them all, as people with high IQ tend to be more successful).

As long as nobody is wealthier or smarter than them and everyone is equal, it's perfectly fine that everyone is broke and stupid.
 
I don't have time for pseudoscience. I'm more interested in real science.

Are you then educated in the hard sciences? What exactly have you made time for if understanding the cultural and historical human elements that have supplied (and inhibited) advances in "real" scientific understanding is not worthy of being fit into your schedule?

Also, for a good example of how social science can lend itself towards less social scientific ends: I once had a Corporate Law professor who, in addition to her Harvard Law degree, had an interesting combination of undergraduate degrees in Economics (may have been Business) and Gender Studies. She used her knowledge from the latter to better acclimate, adjust, and manipulate the very-cooperation-based (but also completely male-dominated) corporate world. That allowed her to serve on many prestigious Fortune 500 boards and she has since started a scholarship and educational program for women wanting to go into Corporate Law. So, just so we're clear, taking classes in social science (my major during my undergraduate was Sociology with minors in Criminal Justice and History) does not mean you'll be an instructor or activist.

I don't give a shit about relativism or whatever. Where is the electron, what happens when we put energy into a system and what happens when energy leaves a system. Guess what? Doesn't matter how you feel. That's life as it is, not as we'd like it to be.

Sadly, the world is not that simple.

You have to be one of the worst trolls on Sherdog.

I honestly can't for the life of me understand why someone would be a troll. But I'd like to think the time and effort that I put into my posts creates a presumption to the contrary.

I've seen some of your posts. I don't think you're a troll. I do, however, think you're unintelligent and most likely very miserable.
 
It's Trotsky. A defense of Marxism in the education system should be expected.

It's the way to utopia, where everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.

Do not blame me that academics and economists have laughed Ayn Rand out of the building. If it were up to me, Atlas Shrugged would be a mandatory 6th grade reading so that those who enjoyed it then can be gifted the introspective self-hatred of thereafter growing up and realizing how fucking stupid and reductive rightist rationale is and how dangerous the arrogance of youth can be.
 
1. Are you then educated in the hard sciences? What exactly have you made time for if understanding the cultural and historical human elements that have supplied (and inhibited) advances in "real" scientific understanding is not worthy of being fit into your schedule?

2. Also, for a good example of how social science can lend itself towards less social scientific ends: I once had a Corporate Law professor who, in addition to her Harvard Law degree, had an interesting combination of undergraduate degrees in Economics (may have been Business) and Gender Studies. She used her knowledge from the latter to better acclimate, adjust, and manipulate the very-cooperation-based (but also completely male-dominated) corporate world. That allowed her to serve on many prestigious Fortune 500 boards and she has since started a scholarship and educational program for women wanting to go into Corporate Law. So, just so we're clear, taking classes in social science (my major during my undergraduate was Sociology with minors in Criminal Justice and History) does not mean you'll be an instructor or activist.



Sadly, the world is not that simple.



I honestly can't for the life of me understand why someone would be a troll. But I'd like to think the time and effort that I put into my posts creates a presumption to the contrary.

I've seen some of your posts. I don't think you're a troll. I do, however, think you're unintelligent and most likely very miserable.
1. Yea, I'm a chemist. And no, social sciences aren't science. The reality is biology is simplified principles of chemistry. Chemistry is simplified principles of physics. But when you work your way down the hierarchy to psychology... ok, yeah some legitimacy is there. We can do repeatable studies, but its a little squirrely. But when you work your way down to sociology or god forbid gender studies... well these clowns don't have a leg to stand on. It's all an ink blot test for these folks.

Literally, everything is physics bro.

2. Ah, Sociology. That explains a lot.
 
Last edited:
Do not blame me that academics and economists have laughed Ayn Rand out of the building. If it were up to me, Atlas Shrugged would be a mandatory 6th grade reading so that those who enjoyed it then can be gifted the introspective self-hatred of thereafter growing up and realizing how fucking stupid and reductive rightist rationale is and how dangerous the arrogance of youth can be.

Are you suggesting that in order to be against Marxism (anyone who looks at Marxist revolutions and communism historically would tend to be unless you are part of Oligarchy) one must be an Ayn Randian?
 
Your answer lies in the state of South Africa. If it happens over time (which eventually it will) the change will be gradual and not much will be that different.
I don't think white were ever a majority in South Africa though, they just held the political power.
 
A paradise where we all chop off our penises and women rule the world. And there is constant never ending revolutionary warfare against the "peasants and oppressors".

And people with low IQ outbreed people with high IQ (because they kill them all, as people with high IQ tend to be more successful).

As long as nobody is wealthier or smarter than them and everyone is equal, it's perfectly fine that everyone is broke and stupid.


This post doesn't make any sense.
 
I don't have time for pseudoscience. I'm more interested in real science.

I don't give a shit about relativism or whatever. Where is the electron, what happens when we put energy into a system and what happens when energy leaves a system. Guess what? Doesn't matter how you feel. That's life as it is, not as we'd like it to be.


Neither does this one
 
A paradise where we all chop off our penises and women rule the world. And there is constant never ending revolutionary warfare against the "peasants and oppressors".

And people with low IQ outbreed people with high IQ (because they kill them all, as people with high IQ tend to be more successful).

As long as nobody is wealthier or smarter than them and everyone is equal, it's perfectly fine that everyone is broke and stupid.

as a person that lived in socialism, i can say you dont know a clue about what youre talking about...
 
Maybe white guys finally get a shot at that sweet brown suga. ;)
 
as a person that lived in socialism, i can say you dont know a clue about what youre talking about...

The kind of socialism that the USSR pushed on the Balkans would be very different to the kind of "socialism" that would be pushed on the west. I would imagine your country was relatively free of political correctness and cultural marxism.
 
Are you suggesting that in order to be against Marxism (anyone who looks at Marxist revolutions and communism historically would tend to be unless you are part of Oligarchy) one must be an Ayn Randian?

Yeah, Trotsky, IDL is more of an ethnonationalist who wants someone to put down opposition to the gov't (justified by fantasies that popular uprisings are secretly funded by enemies of the nation) than a Randroid.
 
I find it unlikely they will be allowed to become a majority. Politicians are not dumb, they know that once they become a majority they will not need the current politicians anymore and will elect their own.
A good example is what happened in the UK. Scotland was dominated by Labour with their usual pandering to minorities, it worked very well until the Scots decided Labour was too British and against independence and voted in 2015 overwhelmingly for the SNP.
Now, the american system is different and it's harder for a third party, but I wouldn't be surprised if down the line a hispanic/mexican party comes on and takes the vote out of the democratic party.

This is hilarious considering what just happened. The threat to Western values is not coming from minorities. Trump explicitly rejected Western values and won the presidency (and minority groups were a large part of the pro-American opposition). And other politicians in the West have tried the same (Le Pen, Farage, etc.).
Fascism is very much western. It was created in Italy and refined in Germany.
Even if you talk about the USA only it was an extremely violent country founded by slave owning planters and was pretty much closed to non-white immigration until 1965, except if you consider slavery as a form of migration. Acceptance of all races and nationalities is a modern trend that might as well not last for long in the big picture.
Also you're delusional if you think these minorities care about the western values you talk about, which I assume to be liberalism. It's just that while you're a minority it's much better to live in a liberal place than an authoritarian one.
As a thought experiment, you're a muslim fanatic, do you prefer to live in Norway or China? In an authoritarian place like China it's way more likely you will get locked up or straight up disappear while in Norway you can live on government benefits, travel to Syria, kill some infidels and go back and get a slap on the wrist.
I read in another thread you talk about how most people that vote republican do so out of racism(and religiosity, gun nuttery and so on) and not because they really believe in conservatism, tax cuts, opposition to fight global warming...and I agree.
Now, 97% of black women vote for Hillary according to exit polls, do you really think that they care about LGBT rights, fighting global warming or what will happen to illegal mexicans?
Come on, you know they like the benefits.


Anyhow, the pandora box is now open, it's unlikely Le Pen or Farage will achieve much themselves because unlike Trump they don't have the backing of a big party but Farage got Brexit, Le Pen is influencing the Républicains who will probably win against the Socialists. OFP may very well win the Austrian presidency. Who knows what else will happen in 2017?
 
Do not blame me that academics and economists have laughed Ayn Rand out of the building. If it were up to me, Atlas Shrugged would be a mandatory 6th grade reading so that those who enjoyed it then can be gifted the introspective self-hatred of thereafter growing up and realizing how fucking stupid and reductive rightist rationale is and how dangerous the arrogance of youth can be.
Ayn Rand is from a dying breed of the right wing. She helped spawn the modern libertarian movement, which can realistically gather around 3% of the vote in the US and almost nothing in Europe.
The current right would most likely gas her and send her to Israel with her anti-nationalistic rhetoric(except for Israel), defense of egoism and globalization(I might be wrong on that last one but that's the feel I had from hearing her).
 
I've seen some of your posts. I don't think you're a troll. I do, however, think you're unintelligent and most likely very miserable.

Everything you write is true. :(:(

38BJCmU.gif
 
Back
Top