B
blanko
Guest
yea but who has paulson produced in his many years as coach. Yea he trained barnett some but barnett was also trained by japanese catch guys as well as did judo.
BJJ is NOT the only way to learn a good ground game, hell it might not even be the BEST way to develop a good ground game... many very talented MMA fighters have made their careers on other fighting systems. Paulson CSW for example is gaining a pretty huge following and in many ways is far more practical than BJJ for MMA application. now, because BJJ has been around a lot longer and is a lot more widespread BETTER martial artists study BJJ but CSW is the better martial art in my book... give in a decade or so and it will start to emerge as a very effective ground combat system. i know its a staple of the extreme couture gyms.
yes paulson did train BJJ but he developed his own system from it called CSW... this is in no way different than the way the Gracies studdied JJ and adapted their own system... it is my opinion that CSW is a form of BJJ that has evolved for the purposes of MMA. i think it is the superior art to train for the purpose.
Nope. I did a lot of CSW and incorporate a lot of it into my grappling. Paulson was a JKD guy and developed CSW before he started BJJ. It was mostly based on his own strengths and training, including boxing, muay thai, judo, and shooto. Paulson is now a BJJ black belt, but he wasn't when he started CSW.
In many places, there are many more CSW places than BJJ places. But I don't think CSW is replacing BJJ. Overall, there are many more BJJ places. BJJ is growing at a much faster rate too. CSW is not better than jiu-jitsu. It just has a different focus. As a JKD guy, Paulson would probably tell you the same. Everyone is different and has different strengths.
I personally feel it is good as a complement to BJJ, and the grappling flows are essential to BJJ too. But the grappling and striking skills can be developed independently too and combined in CSW training effectively. However, it isn't necessary or even best for everyone or even most people.
Saying CSW is better than BJJ is like saying McDonalds is better than Burger King. They are more alike than not and it comes down to personal preference only.
solid arguments and i actually learned a bit from your post. however i feel the point i am trying to get across is being misunderstood... i don't mean to say that CSW is BETTER than BJJ by any means, i feel it is a better fit for MMA because of the nature of it... BJJ is a pure grappling art and as such traditionally will not teach you ways to seamlessly flow from striking to submissions or vice versa... at least as i understand the art. admittedly i have never studdied BJJ because there are no schools in my area.
anyway to answer the other guys question, why do i feel that CSW is a better place to start, good question. CSW alone is not a good place to start but i feel if you take CSW in addition to a muay thai class you are building a great striking base while developing a basic but effective take down and ground game. i have wrestled folkstyle and greco-roman since grade school and 'Rastled since i was knee high...
to be honest i am shocked i didn't get flamed out the ass for these posts... lota guys get pretty touchy when someone talks about their BJJ.
The problem with BJJ is that even if you are great at BJJ, you still have to get your man on the ground, which is why I think CSW. I have just started traing and I've picked up Muay Thai and CSW as my martial arts, because BJJ does nothing if your not on the ground.
What's the difference between an MMA school that has CSW and muay thai versus an MMA school that has BJJ and muay thai? Nothing, except you'll get more gi work at the BJJ place.
Now you are implying that BJJ is the only thing worth training?
you think Fedor has a BJJ coach? I would wager no
loads of serious MMAists that got their skills from judo, sambo or catch schools
WOuldn't you love a private with Aoki? you think he learned his stuff in BJJ?